Literature DB >> 22440458

Tones inferior to eye movements in the EMDR treatment of PTSD.

Marcel A van den Hout1, Marleen M Rijkeboer, Iris M Engelhard, Irene Klugkist, Hellen Hornsveld, Marieke J B Toffolo, Danielle C Cath.   

Abstract

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an effective treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). During EMDR, patients make eye movements (EMs) while recalling traumatic memories, but recently therapists have replaced EMs by alternating beep tones. There are no outcome studies on the effects of tones. In an earlier analogue study, tones were inferior to EMs in the reduction of vividness of aversive memories. In a first EMDR session, 12 PTSD patients recalled trauma memories in three conditions: recall only, recall + tones, and recall + EMs. Three competing hypotheses were tested: 1) EMs are as effective as tones and better than recall only, 2) EMs are better than tones and tones are as effective as recall only, and 3) EMs are better than tones and tones are better than recall only. The order of conditions was balanced, each condition was delivered twice, and decline in memory vividness and emotionality served as outcome measures. The data strongly support hypothesis 2 and 3 over 1: EMs outperformed tones while it remained unclear if tones add to recall only. The findings add to earlier considerations and earlier analogue findings suggesting that EMs are superior to tones and that replacing the former by the latter was premature.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22440458     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  18 in total

1.  Degrading traumatic memories with eye movements: a pilot functional MRI study in PTSD.

Authors:  Kathleen Thomaes; Iris M Engelhard; Marit Sijbrandij; Danielle C Cath; Odile A Van den Heuvel
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2016-11-29

2.  A Case for Translation From the Clinic to the Laboratory.

Authors:  M Alexandra Kredlow; Lycia D de Voogd; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 3.  Assessing mental imagery in clinical psychology: a review of imagery measures and a guiding framework.

Authors:  David G Pearson; Catherine Deeprose; Sophie M A Wallace-Hadrill; Stephanie Burnett Heyes; Emily A Holmes
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-09-11

4.  Making science work in mental health care.

Authors:  Iris M Engelhard
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2012-06-13

5.  Speed Matters: Relationship between Speed of Eye Movements and Modification of Aversive Autobiographical Memories.

Authors:  Suzanne Chantal van Veen; Kevin van Schie; Leoniek D N V Wijngaards-de Meij; Marianne Littel; Iris M Engelhard; Marcel A van den Hout
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Taxing Working Memory during Retrieval of Emotional Memories Does Not Reduce Memory Accessibility When Cued with Reminders.

Authors:  Kevin van Schie; Iris M Engelhard; Marcel A van den Hout
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Psychophysiological Responsivity to Script-Driven Imagery: An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Eye Movements on Public Speaking Flashforwards.

Authors:  Michelle Kearns; Iris M Engelhard
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 8.  Mental Imagery: Functional Mechanisms and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Thomas Naselaris; Emily A Holmes; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Facilitating access to emotions: neural signature of EMDR stimulation.

Authors:  Deborah Herkt; Visal Tumani; Georg Grön; Thomas Kammer; Arne Hofmann; Birgit Abler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An Integrative Model for the Neural Mechanism of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR).

Authors:  Olivier A Coubard
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.