Literature DB >> 22440292

The sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming: an inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming.

B K Boogaard1, S J Oosting, B B Bock, J S C Wiskerke.   

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, the scale and intensity of livestock farming have increased significantly. At the same time, Western societies have become more urbanised and fewer people have close relatives involved in farming. As a result, most citizens have little knowledge or direct experience of what farming entails. In addition, more people are expressing concerns over issues such as farm animal welfare. This has led to increasing public demand for more sustainable ways of livestock farming. To date, little research has been carried out on the social pillar of sustainable livestock farming. The aim of this study is to provide insights into the sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming systems. This study reviews the key findings of earlier published interdisciplinary research about the social perceptions of dairy farming in the Netherlands and Norway (Boogaard et al., 2006, 2008, 2010a and 2010b) and synthesises the implications for sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming. This study argues that the (sociocultural) sustainable development of livestock farming is not an objective concept, but that it is socially and culturally constructed by people in specific contexts. It explains the social pillar of the economics/ecological/social model sustainability in terms of the fields of tensions that exist between modernity, traditions and naturality - 'the MTN knot' - each of which has positive and negative faces. All three angles of vision can be seen in people's attitudes to dairy farming, but the weight given to each differs between individuals and cultures. Hence, sociocultural sustainability is context dependent and needs to be evaluated according to its local meaning. Moreover, sociocultural sustainability is about people's perceptions of livestock farming. Lay people might perceive livestock farming differently and ascribe different meanings to it than experts do, but their 'reality' is just as real. Finally, this study calls for an ongoing collaboration between social and animal scientists in order to develop livestock farming systems that are more socioculturally sustainable.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22440292     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731111000371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  Risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in poultry husbandry by citizens, poultry farmers and poultry veterinarians.

Authors:  M van Asselt; P M Poortvliet; E D Ekkel; B Kemp; E N Stassen
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Healthy and sustainable diets for future generations.

Authors:  Hilary Green; Pierre Broun; Douglas Cook; Karen Cooper; Adam Drewnowski; Duncan Pollard; Gary Sweeney; Anne Roulin
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 3.638

3.  Does picture background matter? People's evaluation of pigs in different farm settings.

Authors:  Gesa Busch; Sarah Gauly; Marie von Meyer-Höfer; Achim Spiller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Developing 'Smart' Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and Consumer-Citizens: A Review.

Authors:  Maeve Mary Henchion; Áine Regan; Marion Beecher; Áine MackenWalsh
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  The Social Construction of Narratives and Arguments in Animal Welfare Discourse and Debate.

Authors:  Mukhtar Muhammad; Jessica E Stokes; Lisa Morgans; Louise Manning
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Public Attitudes to Housing Systems for Pregnant Pigs.

Authors:  E B Ryan; D Fraser; D M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.