Literature DB >> 22440279

Effects of ad libitum and restricted feeding on early production performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake.

N Boddicker1, N K Gabler, M E Spurlock, D Nettleton, J C M Dekkers.   

Abstract

Residual feed intake (RFI), defined as the difference between observed and expected feed intake based on growth and backfat, has been used to investigate genetic variation in feed efficiency in cattle, poultry and pigs. However, little is known about the biological basis of differences in RFI in pigs. To this end, the objective of this study was to evaluate the fifth generation of a line of pigs selected for reduced RFI against a randomly selected Control line for performance, carcass and chemical carcass composition and overall efficiency. Here, emphasis was on the early grower phase. A total of 100 barrows, 50 from each line, were paired by age and weight (22.6 ± 3.9 kg) and randomly assigned to one of four feeding treatments in 11 replicates: ad libitum (Ad), 75% of Ad (Ad75), 55% of Ad (Ad55) and weight stasis (WS), which involved weekly adjustments in intake to keep body weight (BW) constant for each pig. Pigs were individually penned (group housing was used for selection) and were on treatment for 6 weeks. Initial BW did not significantly differ between the lines (P > 0.17). Under Ad feeding, the low RFI pigs consumed 8% less feed compared with Control line pigs (P < 0.06), had less carcass fat (P < 0.05), but with no significant difference in growth rate (P > 0.85). Under restricted feeding, low RFI pigs under the Ad75 treatment had a greater rate of gain while consuming the same amount of feed as Control pigs. Despite the greater gain, no significant line differences in carcass composition or carcass traits were observed. For the WS treatment, low RFI pigs had similar BW (P > 0.37) with no significant difference in feed consumption (P > 0.32). Overall, selection for reduced RFI has decreased feed intake, with limited differences in growth rate but reduced carcass fat, as seen under Ad feeding. Collectively, results indicate that the effects of selection for low RFI are evident during the early grower stage, which allows for greater savings to the producer.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22440279     DOI: 10.1017/S175173111100036X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  Effects of divergent selection for residual feed intake on nitrogen metabolism and lysine utilization in growing pigs.

Authors:  Deltora J Hewitt; Jack C M Dekkers; Treyson Antonick; Abbasali Gheisari; Amanda R Rakhshandeh; Anoosh Rakhshandeh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs.

Authors:  R M Godinho; R Bergsma; F F Silva; C A Sevillano; E F Knol; M S Lopes; P S Lopes; J W M Bastiaansen; S E F Guimarães
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Impact of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis on the performance of pigs divergently selected for feed efficiency.

Authors:  Emma T Helm; Amanda C Outhouse; Kent J Schwartz; Jack C M Dekkers; Steven M Lonergan; Wendy M Rauw; Nicholas K Gabler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Metabolic adaptation of pigs to a Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis dual challenge.

Authors:  Emma T Helm; Amanda C Outhouse; Kent J Schwartz; Steven M Lonergan; Shelby M Curry; Jack C M Dekkers; Nicholas K Gabler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.

Authors:  H Gilbert; Y Billon; L Brossard; J Faure; P Gatellier; F Gondret; E Labussière; B Lebret; L Lefaucheur; N Le Floch; I Louveau; E Merlot; M-C Meunier-Salaün; L Montagne; P Mormede; D Renaudeau; J Riquet; C Rogel-Gaillard; J van Milgen; A Vincent; J Noblet
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Finishing pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency show small differences in intestinal functionality and structure.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Peadar G Lawlor; Elizabeth Magowan; Ursula M McCormack; Tânia Curião; Manfred Hollmann; Reinhard Ertl; Jörg R Aschenbach; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Transcriptome Analysis Reveals that Hepatic Glycolysis and Lipid Synthesis Are Negatively Associated with Feed Efficiency in DLY Pigs.

Authors:  Cineng Xu; Xingwang Wang; Zhanwei Zhuang; Jie Wu; Shenping Zhou; Jianping Quan; Rongrong Ding; Yong Ye; Longlong Peng; Zhenfang Wu; Enqin Zheng; Jie Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Post-weaning blood transcriptomic differences between Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.

Authors:  Haibo Liu; Yet T Nguyen; Dan Nettleton; Jack C M Dekkers; Christopher K Tuggle
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Genetic parameters and expected responses to selection for components of feed efficiency in a Duroc pig line.

Authors:  Juan P Sánchez; Mohamed Ragab; Raquel Quintanilla; Max F Rothschild; Miriam Piles
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Strategies towards Improved Feed Efficiency in Pigs Comprise Molecular Shifts in Hepatic Lipid and Carbohydrate Metabolism.

Authors:  Henry Reyer; Michael Oster; Elizabeth Magowan; Dirk Dannenberger; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.