Literature DB >> 22440214

Impact of QRS duration and morphology on the risk of sudden cardiac death in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis: the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) Study.

Anders M Greve1, Eva Gerdts, Kurt Boman, Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf, Anne B Rossebø, Richard B Devereux, Lars Køber, Simon Ray, Ronnie Willenheimer, Kristian Wachtell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the predictive value of QRS duration and morphology during watchful waiting in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS).
BACKGROUND: QRS duration and morphology are associated with poor prognosis in many different populations, but the predictive value, particularly of the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), in asymptomatic patients with AS has not been well studied.
METHODS: Data were obtained in asymptomatic AS patients randomized to simvastatin/ezetimibe combination versus placebo in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) study. The impact of QRS duration, evaluated as a categorical variable of <85 ms versus 85 to 99 ms and ≥100 ms (excluding bundle branch block [BBB]) and QRS morphology in those with BBB, on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was assessed by adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic covariates.
RESULTS: QRS data were available in 1,542 patients who were followed for a mean of 4.3 ± 0.8 years (6,631 patient-years of follow-up). There were 68 cardiovascular deaths (4.6%), including 27 SCDs (1.8%). QRS duration was <85 ms in 900 patients (58.4%), 85 to 99 ms in 396 (25.7%), ≥100 ms in those without BBB in 144 (9.3%), and 102 (6.6%) in those with BBB. In multivariable analyses, those with QRS duration ≥100 ms had, compared with those with QRS duration <85 ms, a 5-fold higher risk of SCD (95% confidence interval: 1.8 to 13.7, p = 0.002) and a 2.5-fold higher risk of cardiovascular death (95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 5.1, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: QRS duration and morphology in asymptomatic patients with AS are independently associated with a poor prognosis, particularly the risk of SCD.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22440214     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  9 in total

Review 1.  Tools for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death: a review of the literature in different patient populations.

Authors:  Loheetha Ragupathi; Behzad B Pavri
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-01-11

2.  Electrocardiographic appearance of aortic stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Ivana I Vranic
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Fragmented QRS can predict severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Eser Açıkgöz; Belma Yaman; Sadık Kadri Açıkgöz; Salih Topal; Yusuf Tavil; Nuri Bulent Boyacı
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  QRS duration predicts death and hospitalization among patients with atrial fibrillation irrespective of heart failure: evidence from the AFFIRM study.

Authors:  Matthew G Whitbeck; Richard J Charnigo; Jignesh Shah; Gustavo Morales; Steve W Leung; Brandon Fornwalt; Alison L Bailey; Khaled Ziada; Vincent L Sorrell; Milagros M Zegarra; Jenks Thompson; Neil Aboul Hosn; Charles L Campbell; John Gurley; Paul Anaya; David C Booth; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Susan Smyth; David J Moliterno; Claude S Elayi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Sudden cardiac death in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: is the valve to blame?

Authors:  Nicolaj Lyhne Christensen; Rasmus Carter-Storch; Rine Bakkestrøm; Jordi Sanchez Dahl
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-07

6.  Electrocardiogram derived QRS duration associations with elevated central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) in a rural Australian population.

Authors:  Yvonne Yin Leng Lee; Paul Reidler; Herbert Jelinek; Yung Seng Lee; Yuling Zhou; Brett D Hambly; Joel McCabe; Slade Matthews; Honghong Ke; Hassan Assareh; Craig S McLachlan
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2016-02-16

7.  Relationship Between QT Interval and Outcome in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Abdellaziz Dahou; Oumhani Toubal; Marie-Annick Clavel; Jonathan Beaudoin; Julien Magne; Patrick Mathieu; François Philippon; Jean G Dumesnil; Rishi Puri; Henrique B Ribeiro; Éric Larose; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Transcatheter management of severe aortic stenosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Bharat Khialani; Philip MacCarthy
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Sudden Death in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Observations From the CURRENT AS Registry.

Authors:  Tomohiko Taniguchi; Takeshi Morimoto; Hiroki Shiomi; Kenji Ando; Norio Kanamori; Koichiro Murata; Takeshi Kitai; Yuichi Kawase; Chisato Izumi; Takao Kato; Katsuhisa Ishii; Kazuya Nagao; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Mamoru Toyofuku; Naritatsu Saito; Kenji Minatoya; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.