Literature DB >> 22440168

Imputation of genotypes from low- to high-density genotyping platforms and implications for genomic selection.

D P Berry1, J F Kearney.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to quantify the accuracy achievable from imputing genotypes from a commercially available low-density marker panel (2730 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) following edits) to a commercially available higher density marker panel (51 602 SNPs following edits) in Holstein-Friesian cattle using Beagle, a freely available software package. A population of 764 Holstein-Friesian animals born since 2006 were used as the test group to quantify the accuracy of imputation, all of which had genotypes for the high-density panel; only SNPs on the low-density panel were retained with the remaining SNPs to be imputed. The reference population for imputation consisted of 4732 animals born before 2006 also with genotypes on the higher density marker panel. The concordance between the actual and imputed genotypes in the test group of animals did not vary across chromosomes and was on average 95%; the concordance between actual and imputed alleles was, on average, 97% across all SNPs. Genomic predictions were undertaken across a range of production and functional traits for the 764 test group animals using either their real or imputed genotypes. Little or no mean difference in the genomic predictions was evident when comparing direct genomic values (DGVs) using real or imputed genotypes. The average correlation between the DGVs estimated using the real or imputed genotypes for the 15 traits included in the Irish total merit index was 0.97 (range of 0.92 to 0.99), indicating good concordance between proofs from real or imputed genotypes. Results show that a commercially available high-density marker panel can be imputed from a commercially available lower density marker panel, which will also have a lower cost, thereby facilitating a reduction in the cost of genomic selection. Increased available numbers of genotyped and phenotyped animals also has implications for increasing the accuracy of genomic prediction in the entire population and thus genetic gain using genomic selection.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22440168     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731111000309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  20 in total

1.  The Causal Meaning of Genomic Predictors and How It Affects Construction and Comparison of Genome-Enabled Selection Models.

Authors:  Bruno D Valente; Gota Morota; Francisco Peñagaricano; Daniel Gianola; Kent Weigel; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.

Authors:  Aine C O'Brien; Michelle M Judge; Sean Fair; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Assessing single-nucleotide polymorphism selection methods for the development of a low-density panel optimized for imputation in South African Drakensberger beef cattle.

Authors:  Simon F Lashmar; Donagh P Berry; Rian Pierneef; Farai C Muchadeyi; Carina Visser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Nasir Moghaddar; Klint P Gore; Hans D Daetwyler; Ben J Hayes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Methods of tagSNP selection and other variables affecting imputation accuracy in swine.

Authors:  Yvonne M Badke; Ronald O Bates; Catherine W Ernst; Clint Schwab; Justin Fix; Curtis P Van Tassell; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.

Authors:  Roberto Carvalheiro; Solomon A Boison; Haroldo H R Neves; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel; Yuri T Utsunomiya; Ana Maria Pérez O'Brien; Johann Sölkner; John C McEwan; Curtis P Van Tassell; Tad S Sonstegard; José Fernando Garcia
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Effect of genotype imputation on genome-enabled prediction of complex traits: an empirical study with mice data.

Authors:  Vivian P S Felipe; Hayrettin Okut; Daniel Gianola; Martinho A Silva; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Comparison of different imputation methods from low- to high-density panels using Chinese Holstein cattle.

Authors:  Z Weng; Z Zhang; Q Zhang; W Fu; S He; X Ding
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of partial least squares regression to impute SNP genotypes in Italian cattle breeds.

Authors:  Corrado Dimauro; Massimo Cellesi; Giustino Gaspa; Paolo Ajmone-Marsan; Roberto Steri; Gabriele Marras; Nicolò P P Macciotta
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Aniek C Bouwman; John M Hickey; Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.