PURPOSE: Diffuse intrahepatic tumors are difficult to control. Whole-liver radiotherapy has been limited by toxicity, most notably radiation-induced liver disease. Amifostine is a prodrug free-radical scavenger that selectively protects normal tissues and, in a preclinical model of intrahepatic cancer, systemic amifostine reduced normal liver radiation damage without compromising tumor effect. We hypothesized that amifostine would permit escalation of whole-liver radiation dose to potentially control microscopic disease. We also aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of amifostine and its active metabolite WR-1065 to optimize timing of radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a radiation dose-escalation trial for patients with diffuse, intrahepatic cancer treated with whole-liver radiation and intravenous amifostine. Radiation dose was assigned using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. A companion pharmacokinetic study was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated, with a maximum dose of 40 Gy. Using a logistical regression model, compared with our previously treated patients, amifostine increased liver tolerance by 3.3 ± 1.1 Gy (p = 0.007) (approximately 10%) with similar response rates. Peak concentrations of WR-1065 were 25 μM with an elimination half-life of 1.5 h; these levels are consistent with radioprotective effects of amifostine in patients. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate for the first time that amifostine is a normal liver radioprotector. They further suggest that it may be useful to combine amifostine with fractionated or stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with focal intrahepatic cancer.
PURPOSE: Diffuse intrahepatic tumors are difficult to control. Whole-liver radiotherapy has been limited by toxicity, most notably radiation-induced liver disease. Amifostine is a prodrug free-radical scavenger that selectively protects normal tissues and, in a preclinical model of intrahepatic cancer, systemic amifostine reduced normal liver radiation damage without compromising tumor effect. We hypothesized that amifostine would permit escalation of whole-liver radiation dose to potentially control microscopic disease. We also aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of amifostine and its active metabolite WR-1065 to optimize timing of radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a radiation dose-escalation trial for patients with diffuse, intrahepatic cancer treated with whole-liver radiation and intravenous amifostine. Radiation dose was assigned using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. A companion pharmacokinetic study was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated, with a maximum dose of 40 Gy. Using a logistical regression model, compared with our previously treated patients, amifostine increased liver tolerance by 3.3 ± 1.1 Gy (p = 0.007) (approximately 10%) with similar response rates. Peak concentrations of WR-1065 were 25 μM with an elimination half-life of 1.5 h; these levels are consistent with radioprotective effects of amifostine in patients. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate for the first time that amifostine is a normal liver radioprotector. They further suggest that it may be useful to combine amifostine with fractionated or stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with focal intrahepatic cancer.
Authors: B Emami; J Lyman; A Brown; L Coia; M Goitein; J E Munzenrider; B Shank; L J Solin; M Wesson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-05-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: L A Dawson; C J McGinn; D Normolle; R K Ten Haken; S Walker; W Ensminger; T S Lawrence Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D M Brizel; T H Wasserman; M Henke; V Strnad; V Rudat; A Monnier; F Eschwege; J Zhang; L Russell; W Oster; R Sauer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edgar Ben-Josef; Daniel Normolle; William D Ensminger; Suzette Walker; Daniel Tatro; Randall K Ten Haken; James Knol; Laura A Dawson; Charlie Pan; Theodore S Lawrence Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew H Stenmark; Yue Cao; Hesheng Wang; Andrew Jackson; Edgar Ben-Josef; Randall K Ten Haken; Theodore S Lawrence; Mary Feng Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 6.280