Literature DB >> 22439955

Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sows and piglets.

E M Baxter1, A B Lawrence, S A Edwards.   

Abstract

The construction of a suitable farrowing environment is a continuing dilemma: the piglet's needs must be matched with those of the sow and the farmer during the main phases that constitute farrowing: nest building, parturition and lactation. Difficulties exist in resolving the various conflicts of interest between and within these three parties (e.g. sow v. farmer: space needed for nest building v. space needed to maximise the amount of farrowing accommodation, or sow v. sow: ensuring the survival of the current litter v. maintaining condition for future litters). Thus, the challenge is to resolve these conflicts and design a system that maximises sow and piglet welfare while maintaining an economically efficient and sustainable enterprise. In order to successfully design a farrowing and lactation environment, it is necessary to consider the biological needs of both the sow and her litter. The natural behaviour of the sow has been well documented and very little variation exists between reports of peri-parturient behaviour observed in extensively kept domestic sows and their wild counterparts. The failure for domestication to significantly alter these behavioural patterns provides evidence that they are biologically significant and that the commercial farrowing environment should attempt to accommodate this behavioural repertoire. In addition, the behavioural needs of the piglets, as well as the physiological needs of both sows and their offspring should be considered. This article aims to review the considerable body of literature detailing the behavioural repertoire of sows and their offspring during the different phases of farrowing, and the accompanying physiological processes. The focus is on identifying biological needs of the animals involved in order to synthesise the appropriate design criteria for farrowing and lactation systems, which should optimise both welfare and animal production.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22439955     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110002272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  14 in total

1.  Sow stress levels and behavior and piglet performances in farrowing crates and farrowing pens with temporary crating.

Authors:  Sébastien Goumon; Iva Leszkowová; Marie Šimecková; Gudrun Illmann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  A critical reflection on intensive pork production with an emphasis on animal health and welfare.

Authors:  Dominiek G D Maes; Jeroen Dewulf; Carlos Piñeiro; Sandra Edwards; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Francisca C Velkers; Lisa Fijn; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  How does intrauterine crowding affect locomotor performance in newborn pigs? A study of force generating capacity and muscle composition of the hind limb.

Authors:  Charlotte Vanden Hole; Silke Cleuren; Chris Van Ginneken; Sara Prims; Miriam Ayuso; Steven Van Cruchten; Peter Aerts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Towards Farm Animal Welfare and Sustainability.

Authors:  Henry Buller; Harry Blokhuis; Per Jensen; Linda Keeling
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  The Effect of Sows' and Piglets' Behaviour on Piglet Crushing Patterns in Two Different Farrowing Pen Systems.

Authors:  Thies Nicolaisen; Eyke Lühken; Nina Volkmann; Karl Rohn; Nicole Kemper; Michaela Fels
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Positive Human Contact and Housing Systems Impact the Responses of Piglets to Various Stressors.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Alan J Tilbrook; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Effects of Farrowing Stall Layout and Number of Heat Lamps on Sow and Piglet Production Performance.

Authors:  Suzanne M Leonard; Hongwei Xin; Tami M Brown-Brandl; Brett C Ramirez; Somak Dutta; Gary A Rohrer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Comparison of three different farrowing systems: skin lesions and behaviour of sows with special regard to nursing behaviour in a group housing system for lactating sows.

Authors:  T Nicolaisen; B Risch; E Lühken; C van Meegen; M Fels; N Kemper
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microbiological air quality in free-farrowing housing systems for sows.

Authors:  E Lühken; T Nicolaisen; J Stracke; J Schulz; N Kemper
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2019-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.