Literature DB >> 22439657

Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners.

Isabelle Stoate1, Gabriele Wulf, Rebecca Lewthwaite.   

Abstract

We followed up on recent findings demonstrating that enhancing performers' expectancies can improve their performance. Specifically, we examined whether providing experienced runners with positive feedback regarding their movement efficiency would increase running efficiency. Two groups of experienced runners ran on a treadmill at 75% of their maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) for 10 min. One group (enhanced expectancy) was provided with (fabricated) feedback about the efficiency of their running style every 2 min. A control group was not given feedback. Oxygen consumption decreased in the enhanced expectancy group across measurement times (every 2 min for 10 min), but remained the same in the control group. In addition, performance perceptions changed only in the enhanced expectancy group, indicating a perception of greater ease of running and reduced fatigue when assessed after compared with before running. Finally, positive affect increased from a pre- to a post-test in the enhanced expectancy group, in contrast to the control group. Our findings show that enhanced expectancies can have a positive effect on movement efficiency and running experience. They add to the accumulating evidence for the social-cognitive-affective-motor nature of motor performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22439657     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.671533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a review.

Authors:  Hollie S Jones; Emily L Williams; Craig A Bridge; Dave Marchant; Adrian W Midgley; Dominic Micklewright; Lars R Mc Naughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Skilled Throwing Performance: A Test of the OPTIMAL Theory.

Authors:  Jacquelyn V L Sertic; Jason M Avedesian; James W Navalta
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  More bang for the buck: autonomy support increases muscular efficiency.

Authors:  Takehiro Iwatsuki; Hui-Ting Shih; Reza Abdollahipour; Gabriele Wulf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-12

5.  Effect of affective feedback and competitiveness on performance and the psychological experience of exercise within a virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Nicole Trewick; David L Neumann; Kyra Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  The Upside to Feeling Worse Than Average (WTA): A Conceptual Framework to Understand When, How, and for Whom WTA Beliefs Have Long-Term Benefits.

Authors:  Ashley V Whillans; Alexander H Jordan; Frances S Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-08

7.  Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback.

Authors:  Hollie S Jones; Emily L Williams; David Marchant; S Andy Sparks; Craig A Bridge; Adrian W Midgley; Lars R Mc Naughton
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.