Literature DB >> 22438468

A common signal detection model accounts for both perception and discrimination of the watercolor effect.

Frédéric Devinck1, Kenneth Knoblauch.   

Abstract

Establishing the relation between perception and discrimination is a fundamental objective in psychophysics, with the goal of characterizing the neural mechanisms mediating perception. Here, we show that a procedure for estimating a perceptual scale based on a signal detection model also predicts discrimination performance. We use a recently developed procedure, Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS), to measure the perceptual strength of a long-range, color, filling-in phenomenon, the Watercolor Effect (WCE), as a function of the luminance ratio between the two components of its generating contour. MLDS is based on an equal-variance, gaussian, signal detection model and yields a perceptual scale with interval properties. The strength of the fill-in percept increased 10-15 times the estimate of the internal noise level for a 3-fold increase in the luminance ratio. Each observer's estimated scale predicted discrimination performance in a subsequent paired-comparison task. A common signal detection model accounts for both the appearance and discrimination data. Since signal detection theory provides a common metric for relating discrimination performance and neural response, the results have implications for comparing perceptual and neural response functions.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438468     DOI: 10.1167/12.3.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  6 in total

1.  Contribution of a luminance-dependent S-cone mechanism to non-assimilative color spreading in the watercolor configuration.

Authors:  Eiji Kimura; Mikako Kuroki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Assimilative and non-assimilative color spreading in the watercolor configuration.

Authors:  Eiji Kimura; Mikako Kuroki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Quantifying the watercolor effect: from stimulus properties to neural models.

Authors:  Frédéric Devinck; Peggy Gerardin; Michel Dojat; Kenneth Knoblauch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Maximum likelihood estimation of difference scaling functions for suprathreshold judgments.

Authors:  Emily S Teti; Terece L Turton; Jonah M Miller; Roxana Bujack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Asymmetric effects of luminance and chrominance in the watercolor illusion.

Authors:  Andrew J Coia; Michael A Crognale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Linking perceived to physical contrast: Comparing results from discrimination and difference-scaling experiments.

Authors:  Christopher Shooner; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.