Literature DB >> 22438363

Extraspinal findings at lumbar spine CT examinations: prevalence and clinical importance.

Stefanie Y Lee1, Mark S Landis, Ian G Ross, Aashish Goela, Andrew E Leung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the prevalence and clinical importance of extraspinal abnormalities in adult outpatients undergoing computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this prospective study. Informed consent was obtained from 400 consecutive adult outpatients (mean age, 49 years; 212 male and 188 female patients) undergoing lumbar spine CT for low back pain and/or radiculopathy. Those with known malignancy were excluded. Dedicated spinal and abdominal full-field-of-view (FOV) images for each patient were reviewed by at least one neuroradiologist and two body radiologists. Extraspinal abnormalities were classified according to the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). The electronic medical record of the patients with C-RADS E3 and E4 extraspinal findings were reviewed to assess how many of these findings were previously unknown, and the patients were followed up 24-36 months after the initial CT to determine their work-up and outcome.
RESULTS: Extraspinal findings were present on images in 162 (40.5%) of 400 lumbar spine CT examinations; 59 (14.8%) patients had indeterminate or clinically important findings requiring clinical correlation or further evaluation. After review of the electronic medical record, the prevalence of clinically important findings was 4.3%, comprising an early-stage renal cell carcinoma and transitional cell carcinoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, sarcoidosis, and 13 abdominal aortic aneurysms. Excluding anatomic variants, the full FOV was required to best visualize extraspinal abnormalities in 127 (79.4%) of 160 patients.
CONCLUSION: Reviewing the full-FOV images from lumbar spine CT examinations will result in the detection of a small number of substantial extraspinal pathologic findings in addition to many benign incidental findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438363     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Incidental extraspinal imaging findings on adult EOS full body radiographs: prevalence and clinical importance.

Authors:  Lily Wood; Christopher Martin; David Polly; Samuel Luchsinger; Takashi Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Extraspinal Incidental Findings on Routine MRI of Lumbar Spine: Prevalence and Reporting Rates in 1278 Patients.

Authors:  Sedat Alpaslan Tuncel; Bekir Çaglı; Aslan Tekataş; Mehmet Yadigar Kırıcı; Ercüment Ünlü; Hakan Gençhellaç
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Extraspinal findings prevalence and clinical significance in 4250 lumbar spine MRI exams.

Authors:  Ruba A Khasawneh; Ziyad Mohaidat; Firas A Khasawneh; Ahmad Farah; Maha Gharaibeh; Mwaffaq El-Heis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study.

Authors:  Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi; Alessandro Giona; Alberto Corrado Di Martino; Yuri Errante; Laura Scarciolla; Carlo Augusto Mallio; Vincenzo Denaro; Bruno Beomonte Zobel
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-03-02

5.  Incidental extraspinal findings in the lumbar spine during magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Mogahid M A Zidan; Ikhlas A Hassan; Abdelrahaman M Elnour; Wadah M Ali; Mustafa Z Mahmoud; Batil Alonazi; Abbas Khalid; Salah Ali
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-09-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.