Literature DB >> 2243746

Postneonatal mortality in the United States: an international perspective.

J C Kleinman1, J L Kiely.   

Abstract

The international standing of the United States in postneonatal mortality has deteriorated from third in 1950 to sixteenth in 1986. The high rate among United States blacks is not the reason for the poor United States standing: ten other countries had lower rates than that for United States whites. Recent trends show a slowdown in the decline in postneonatal mortality between 1970 to 1981 and 1981 to 1986 in Canada, England and Wales, Netherlands, and the United States. Norway actually experienced increases during the latter period. Only France showed an acceleration in its decline during the 1980s. Canada has maintained the most rapid rate of decline between 1950 and 1986. Although all countries examined here reported Sudden Infant Death Syndrome as the leading cause of postneonatal deaths, there was twofold variation among the countries in the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome rate. Similarly, congenital anomalies, the second leading cause of death, showed a 50% range in mortality rates. Infections accounted for less than 10% of all postneonatal deaths. A reasonable approach to assessing the magnitude of preventable mortality in the postneonatal period is to use mortality from all causes except congenital anomalies among normal birth weight infants. United States whites had a lower "preventable" postneonatal mortality rate than Denmark, England and Wales, and Scotland, but a higher rate than Sweden. United States blacks, on the other hand, had by far the highest rates. Disaggregating the United States rates further into three broad maternal risk groups, there was a doubling of rates with increasing level of maternal risk. About half the postneonatal deaths among normal birth weight infants could be prevented if the entire population experienced the rates of the lowest maternal risk group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2243746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

1.  Social differences in Swedish infant mortality by cause of death, 1983 to 1986.

Authors:  M L Nordström; S Cnattingius; B Haglund
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Infant and perinatal mortality in Spain 1981-1991: interprovincial variations in Autonomous Communities with extreme economic levels.

Authors:  M F Domínguez-Berjón; J Benach; M D García-Arcal; C Borrell
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  A population-based registry study of infant mortality in the Arctic: Greenland and Denmark, 1973-1997.

Authors:  Jeppe Friborg; Anders Koch; Flemming Stenz; Jan Wohlfahrt; Mads Melbye
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Adolescent parity and infant mortality, Minnesota, 1980 through 1988.

Authors:  W L Hellerstedt; P L Pirie; G R Alexander
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Why Is Infant Mortality Higher in the United States Than in Europe?

Authors:  Alice Chen; Emily Oster; Heidi Williams
Journal:  Am Econ J Econ Policy       Date:  2016-05

6.  Infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality trends in a disaster region and in Japan, 2002-2012: a multi-attribute compositional study.

Authors:  Ai Tashiro; Honami Yoshida; Etsuji Okamoto
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Infant mortality trends in a region of Belarus, 1980-2000.

Authors:  Lauren J Zichittella; Martin C Mahoney; Silvana Lawvere; Arthur M Michalek; Sergey P Chunikhovskiy; Natan Khotianov
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 2.125

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.