Literature DB >> 22437433

The premises and promises of trolls in Norwegian biodiversity preservation: on the boundaries between bureaucracy and science.

Ingrid Bay-Larsen1.   

Abstract

This paper examines the perception and implementation of scientific knowledge among Norwegian environmental bureaucrats in the process of preserving biodiversity. Based on interviews with environmental officials and scientists, and document studies, the data reveal a mismatch between the ideal administrative world presented by environmental managers, and the empirical reality of biodiversity vulnerability and preservation. The environmental officials depict a process where their mandate is merely instrumental, where science provides objective descriptions of biodiversity value, and where the spheres of science, policy and administration are strictly separated. Instead of a transparent strategy for handling scientific ambiguities inherent in biodiversity value assessments (such as complexity and uncertainty), and administrative judgments, the paper argues that these boundary objects and areas are perceived as 'trolls' that are ignored and hidden by environmental officials. This strategy appears intuitive and guided by a linear decision making paradigm where boundary objects are considered illegitimate. As a solution to possible obstacles stemming from this institutional vacuum, the article finally discusses the potential of adapting or assimilating the trolls to better meet the challenges of biodiversity preservation. A viable first step might be cross-disciplinary characterisation of complexities and uncertainties of biodiversity assessments. This might help to articulate the binary ontology of value assessments and to better address the critical administrative, political and scientific intersections. These boundary areas must be re-institutionalised by environmental agencies, and cognizant strategies must be devised and implemented for making professional judgment and discretion. Finally, it may amount to a more honest stance on conservation, where the inherent complexities to biodiversity preservation may be managed as complexities, and not as trolls.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22437433     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9837-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Ecology. Rift over biodiversity divides ecologists.

Authors:  J Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  When doubt is a sure thing.

Authors:  Jim Giles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies.

Authors:  Jeroen van der Sluijs
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.915

4.  Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time.

Authors:  Colin J Legg; Laszlo Nagy
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Biodiversity as patient: diagnoses and treatment.

Authors:  Marc-André Villard; Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.560

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.