Literature DB >> 22436968

Community trends in the use and characteristics of persons with acute myocardial infarction who are transported by emergency medical services.

Robert J Goldberg1, Julie Lamusta, Chad Darling, Matthew DeWolf, Jane S Saczynski, Darleen Lessard, Jeanine Ward, Joel M Gore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Limited data exist on recent trends in ambulance use and factors associated with ambulance use in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly from the more generalizable perspective of a community-wide investigation. This population-based prospective epidemiologic study describes the decade-long trends (1997-2007) in the use of emergency medical services (EMS) by residents of the Worcester, Massachusetts, metropolitan area who are hospitalized for AMI and the characteristics of patients with AMI who are transported to the hospital by EMS (n = 3789) compared with those transported by other means (n = 1505).
METHODS: The study population consisted of 5294 patients hospitalized for AMI at 11 greater Worcester medical centers in 5 annual periods between 1997 and 2007. Information on the use of EMS and the factors associated with EMS use was obtained through the review of hospital medical records.
RESULTS: There was a progressive increase in the proportion of greater Worcester residents with AMI who were transported to central Massachusetts hospitals by ambulance over time (66.9% transported in 1997; 74.9% transported in 2007). Patients transported by EMS were older, more likely to be women, and more likely to have a greater prevalence of previously diagnosed comorbidities.
CONCLUSION: Our findings provide encouragement for the use of EMS in residents of a large central New England community hospitalized with AMI. Despite increasing trends in ambulance use, more research is needed to explore the reasons why patients with AMI do not use EMS in the setting of an acute cardiac emergency.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22436968      PMCID: PMC3387334          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  25 in total

1.  Use of the emergency department by Somali immigrants and refugees.

Authors:  Pamela J DeShaw
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2006-08

2.  Thoughts, actions, and factors associated with prehospital delay in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Marie Thuresson; Marianne Berglin Jarlöv; Bertil Lindahl; Leif Svensson; Crister Zedigh; Johan Herlitz
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  Association between prepayment systems and emergency medical services use among patients with acute chest discomfort syndrome. For the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study.

Authors:  D B Siepmann; N C Mann; J R Hedges; M R Daya
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Trends in prehospital delay time and use of emergency medical services for acute myocardial infarction: experience in 4 US communities from 1987-2000.

Authors:  Aileen P McGinn; Wayne D Rosamond; David C Goff; Herman A Taylor; J Shawn Miles; Lloyd Chambless
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Use of emergency medical service transport among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines.

Authors:  Robin Mathews; Eric D Peterson; Shuang Li; Matthew T Roe; Seth W Glickman; Stephen D Wiviott; Jorge F Saucedo; Elliott M Antman; Alice K Jacobs; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  A 25-year perspective into the changing landscape of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (the Worcester Heart Attack Study).

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Frederick A Spencer; Jorge Yarzebski; Darleen Lessard; Joel M Gore; Joseph S Alpert; James E Dalen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Utilization of emergency medical services for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Meischke; M S Eisenberg; S M Schaeffer; S K Damon; M P Larsen; D K Henwood
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction).

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prehospital delay in acute coronary syndrome--an analysis of the components of delay.

Authors:  Michael Mundt Ottesen; Ulrik Dixen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Køber
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Coronary heart disease mortality among young adults in the U.S. from 1980 through 2002: concealed leveling of mortality rates.

Authors:  Earl S Ford; Simon Capewell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  3 in total

1.  Neutrophil crosstalk during cardiac wound healing after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Upendra Chalise; Mediha Becirovic-Agic; Merry L Lindsey
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2022-01-31

2.  Decade Long Trends (2001-2011) in Duration of Pre-Hospital Delay Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized for an Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Raghavendra P Makam; Nathaniel Erskine; Jorge Yarzebski; Darleen Lessard; Jason Lau; Jeroan Allison; Joel M Gore; Jerry Gurwitz; David D McManus; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Reperfused vs. nonreperfused myocardial infarction: when to use which model.

Authors:  Merry L Lindsey; Lisandra E de Castro Brás; Kristine Y DeLeon-Pennell; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis; Ganesh V Halade; Caitlin C O'Meara; Francis G Spinale; Zamaneh Kassiri; Jonathan A Kirk; Petra Kleinbongard; Crystal M Ripplinger; Keith R Brunt
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.125

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.