Literature DB >> 22436967

Cardiovascular implantable electronic device endocarditis treated with daptomycin with or without transvenous removal.

Carlo Tascini1, Maria Grazia Bongiorni, Andrea Di Cori, Antonello Di Paolo, Marina Polidori, Enrico Tagliaferri, Serena Fondelli, Ezio Soldati, Ilaria Ciullo, Alessandro Leonildi, Romano Danesi, Giovanni Coluccia, Francesco Menichetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Nine patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) endocarditis were treated with daptomycin after the failure of previous treatment. The blood and CIED lead cultures of 1 patient were negative. In the other 8 patients, we observed 6 monomicrobic infections and 2 polymicrobic infections. Overall, 10 strains were isolated in these patients: 4 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 2 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus epidermidis, 1 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 1 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, 1 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus hominis, and 1 Propionibacterium acnes. The CIED was removed transvenously in 7 patients. Two patients were too sick for the removal of their CIED, and were cured with 6 mg/kg of daptomycin for 60 and 110 days, respectively, without adverse events.
RESULTS: One patient died 4 days after the removal of his CIED because of a complicated abdominal aortic aneurysm. The other 8 patients were cured, with a mean follow-up of 17 ± 8 months. The removed leads were negative, after daptomycin therapy, in 4 cases out of 7. The mean ratio between peak daptomycin concentration and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the causative strains was 38.3 ± 18.5. For patients whose data were available, the ratio between peak daptomycin concentration and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) was 13.2 ± 3.2.
CONCLUSION: Daptomycin monotherapy may be a useful therapeutic tool in difficult-to-treat CIED endocarditis, resulting in a high rate of cures and sterilized leads removed. The ratio between peak daptomycin concentration and MIC or MBC may be useful as predictive tool for treatment success.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22436967     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  3 in total

Review 1.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Management of MRSA/GISA, VISA Endocarditis.

Authors:  Cédric Jacqueline; Jocelyne Caillon; David Boutoille
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Daptomycin for the treatment of major gram-positive infections after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A Kornberger; B Luchting; F Kur; M Weis; F Weis; U A Stock; A Beiras-Fernandez
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.637

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.