Literature DB >> 22436500

A Comparative Study of Imaging Techniques in Aortic Dissection, DeBakey Type I: Intraoperative Live Three-Dimensional Epicardial Echocardiography, Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography, and Multislice Computed Tomography.

Manisha Mishra1, Poonam Khurana, Zile S Meharwal, Naresh Trehan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : To compare the accuracy of intraoperative live 3-dimensional epicardial echocardiography, multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging in the detection of thoracic aortic dissection, site of intimal tear, and involvement of arch vessel.
METHODS: : Of 24 patients studied from October 2003 to September 2004, 12 had aortic dissection. They were examined preoperatively with contrast material-enhanced MSCT and multiplane TEE. Intraoperative live 3-dimensional epicardial echocardiographic evaluation of the ascending aorta and arch was performed. Imaging results in terms of detection of aortic dissection, site of intimal tear, and involvement of coronary arteries and arch vessels were confirmed at intraoperative exploration by the operating surgeon as the reference standard.
RESULTS: : Sensitivity in the detection of thoracic aortic dissection was 100% for all techniques. Specificity was 92%, 92%, and 100% for live 3-dimensional epicardial echocardiography, multiplane TEE, and MSCT imaging, respectively. In the assessment of aortic arch vessel involvement, sensitivity was 92%, 58%, and 92%, and specificity was 75%, 50%, and 83%, respectively. For the detection of the site of intimal tear, sensitivity was 92%,92%, and 58%, and specificity was 83%,75%, and 50%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: : Intraoperative live 3-dimensional epicardial echocardiography is as valuable as multiplane TEE and MSCT imaging in the detection of thoracic aortic dissection. In the assessment of the aortic arch vessel involvement, MSCT and live 3-dimensional epicardial echocardiography are superior (P < 0.05), whereas live 3-dimensional epicardial echocardiography and TEE are superior in detection of site of intimal tear (P < 0.05).

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 22436500     DOI: 10.1097/01243895-200512000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innovations (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-9845


  3 in total

1.  Prediction of Intimal Tear Site by Computed Tomography in Acute Aortic Dissection Type A.

Authors:  Jun Sung Kim; Kay-Hyun Park; Cheong Lim; Dong Jin Kim; Yochun Jung; Yoon Cheol Shin; Sang Il Choi; Eun Ju Chun; Jin Young Yoo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.243

2.  The use of intraoperative epiaortic ultrasonography in monitoring patients over 75 years old treated with aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Tomasz Niklewski; Michał Zembala; Dariusz Puszczewicz; Paweł Nadziakiewicz; Wojciech Karolak; Marian Zembala
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 3.  Aortic Dissection: A Review of the Pathophysiology, Management and Prospective Advances.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayed; Malak Munir; Eshak I Bahbah
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.