Literature DB >> 22436488

Sparing the posterior surgical site when planning radiation therapy for thoracic metastatic spinal disease.

Jorrit-Jan Verlaan1, Paulien G Westhoff, Jochem Hes, Yvette M van der Linden, René M Castelein, F Cumhur Oner, Marco van Vulpen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Most patients with painful spinal metastases are sufficiently palliated by hypofractionated radiotherapy. However, a small group of patients will need surgical intervention to treat symptomatic spinal cord compression and/or gross mechanical instability. Irradiation of a (prospective) surgical area may lead to postsurgery complications, including wound dehiscence, infection, and chronic wound ulcers. Decreasing the radiation dose to the surgical area could reduce radiation-induced toxicity and associated surgical complications.
PURPOSE: To investigate an alternative radiation technique designed to lower the surgical area dose while delivering an adequate target dose and minimal off-target dose. STUDY
DESIGN: Comparison of radiation doses received by various anatomic structures after simulating irradiation with a routine posteroanterior single field (SF) technique and experimental multiple field (MF) technique in a setting of thoracic metastatic spinal disease.
METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) data from six previously treated patients with a total of 10 thoracic spinal metastases were used to plan four radiation schemes (SF8 Gy; SF20 Gy; MF8 Gy; and MF20 Gy). Discrete anatomic structures were defined on CT data, including a posterior surgical area, and after simulation the doses received were calculated and compared for the 8 Gy and 20 Gy techniques.
RESULTS: With the experimental MF technique, a clinically relevant dose could be delivered to the affected vertebra, whereas the dose received at the (prospective) surgical area could be significantly reduced compared with the SF technique. The dose received at the nontarget tissues fell below the threshold level for clinical relevance.
CONCLUSIONS: This radiation planning study showed the feasibility of sparing the surgical area while delivering an adequate dose to affected vertebrae in thoracic metastatic spinal disease.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22436488     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness and toxicity of conventional radiotherapy treatment for painful spinal metastases: a detailed course of side effects after opposing fields versus a single posterior field technique.

Authors:  Paulien G Westhoff; Alexander de Graeff; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Ilse de Pree; Marco van Vulpen; Jan Willem H Leer; Corrie A M Marijnen; Yvette M van der Linden
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.