Literature DB >> 22436397

Socioeconomic inequalities in incidence of lung and upper aero-digestive tract cancer by age, tumour subtype and sex: a population-based study in Scotland (2000-2007).

Katharine H Sharpe1, Alex D McMahon, Paula McClements, Chris Watling, David H Brewster, David I Conway.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung and upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancer risk is associated with socioeconomic inequality (SEI) but the degree of socioeconomic burden by age, tumour subtype, and sex is not known.
METHODS: We reviewed 216,305 cases excluding non melanoma skin cancer (All Cancer) comprising 37,274 lung; 8216 head and neck; and 6534 oesophageal cancers from 2000 to 2007 classified into anatomical or morphology subtypes. Deprivation was measured using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and SEI was measured using the Slope Index of Inequality and the Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Analyses were partitioned by 5-year age group and sex. RII was adapted to rank tumour type contribution to All Cancer SEI and to examine subtype by age and sex simultaneously. Rank was defined as proportion of All Cancer SEI.
RESULTS: All Cancer SEI was greater for males (RII=0.366; female RII=0.279); the combination of lung and UADT SEI contributed 91% and 81% respectively to All Cancer SEI. For both sexes lung and UADT subtypes showed significant SEI (P<0.001) except oesophageal adenocarcinoma in males (P=0.193); for females, SEI was borderline significant (P=0.048). Although RII rank differed by sex, all lung and larynx subtypes contributed most to All Cancer SEI with RII rank for oral cavity, oesophagus-squamous cell, and oropharynx following. For males 40-44 years, SEI increased abruptly peaking at 55-59 years. For females, SEI gradually peaked 10 years later. In both sexes, the SEI peak preceded peak incidence.
CONCLUSION: SEI in lung and UADT cancers vary greatly by age, tumour subtype and sex; these variations are likely to largely reflect differences between the sexes in risk behaviours which vary by birth cohort and are socioeconomically patterned.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22436397     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  16 in total

1.  Family Socioeconomic Position and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis and a Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Xusen Zou; Runchen Wang; Zhao Yang; Qixia Wang; Wenhai Fu; Zhenyu Huo; Fan Ge; Ran Zhong; Yu Jiang; Jiangfu Li; Shan Xiong; Wen Hong; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 2.  Social group disparities in the incidence and prognosis of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shao-Hua Xie; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Neighborhood Disadvantage and Lung Cancer Incidence in Ever-Smokers at a Safety Net Health-Care System: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yosra Adie; Daniel J Kats; Abdulhakim Tlimat; Adam Perzynski; Jarrod Dalton; Douglas Gunzler; Yasir Tarabichi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Life course models for upper aero-digestive tract cancer.

Authors:  Bhawna Gupta; Ratilal Lalloo; Newell W Johnson
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  The effect of socioeconomic status on health-care delay and treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nana Wang; Fangli Cao; Fang Liu; Yibin Jia; Jianbo Wang; Cihang Bao; Xintong Wang; Qingxu Song; Bingxu Tan; Yufeng Cheng
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Association between socioeconomic factors and cancer risk: a population cohort study in Scotland (1991-2006).

Authors:  Katharine H Sharpe; Alex D McMahon; Gillian M Raab; David H Brewster; David I Conway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Population-based incidence trends of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers by sex among the poorest and underprivileged populations.

Authors:  Ajit Auluck; Blake Byron Walker; Greg Hislop; Scott A Lear; Nadine Schuurman; Miriam Rosin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Occupational prestige, social mobility and the association with lung cancer in men.

Authors:  Thomas Behrens; Isabelle Groß; Jack Siemiatycki; David I Conway; Ann Olsson; Isabelle Stücker; Florence Guida; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Hermann Pohlabeln; Wolfgang Ahrens; Irene Brüske; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Per Gustavsson; Dario Consonni; Franco Merletti; Lorenzo Richiardi; Lorenzo Simonato; Cristina Fortes; Marie-Elise Parent; John McLaughlin; Paul Demers; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; David Zaridze; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Peter Rudnai; Jolanta Lissowska; Eleonora Fabianova; Adonina Tardón; John K Field; Rodica Stanescu Dumitru; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen; Paolo Boffetta; Kurt Straif; Joachim Schüz; Jan Hovanec; Benjamin Kendzia; Beate Pesch; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Nationwide population-based study reveals increased malignancy risk in taiwanese liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yung Fong Tsai; Hsiu Pin Chen; Fu Chao Liu; Shih Hao Liu; Chun Yu Chen; Chih Wen Cheng; Jr-Rung Lin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-13

10.  The role of patient, tumour and system factors in socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer treatment: population-based study.

Authors:  L F Forrest; M White; G Rubin; J Adams
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.