Amy Nicolson1, Lois Moir, Jeannine Millsteed. 1. Faculty of Computing, Health, and Science, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on the effects of assistive technology (AT) on family caregivers of children with physical disabilities. METHOD: Electronic searches of Medline, CINAHL Plus, PubMed, and PsychInfo were conducted. The main search terms were AT, caregiver, physical disability, cerebral palsy and quality of life. Studies were included if they related to the impact of AT on the family caregiver of children with physical impairment. Data extraction and quality assessments were conducted by three reviewers. RESULTS: Five articles were eligible for inclusion. Two studies rated weak quality of evidence (level 5), two studies rated moderate quality of evidence (level 3), and one article was a systematic review, rating high level of quality (level 1). A paucity of literature, small sample sizes, descriptive study designs and weak methodological quality meant a narrative review was possible. Three articles reported that AT lightened caregiver assistance in the areas of mobility, self- care and social function. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that AT has a positive impact on children with physical impairments and their caregivers. Future studies in this area could include valid and reliable outcome measures of AT use and the psychological impacts of AT on caring for a child with physical impairments.
PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on the effects of assistive technology (AT) on family caregivers of children with physical disabilities. METHOD: Electronic searches of Medline, CINAHL Plus, PubMed, and PsychInfo were conducted. The main search terms were AT, caregiver, physical disability, cerebral palsy and quality of life. Studies were included if they related to the impact of AT on the family caregiver of children with physical impairment. Data extraction and quality assessments were conducted by three reviewers. RESULTS: Five articles were eligible for inclusion. Two studies rated weak quality of evidence (level 5), two studies rated moderate quality of evidence (level 3), and one article was a systematic review, rating high level of quality (level 1). A paucity of literature, small sample sizes, descriptive study designs and weak methodological quality meant a narrative review was possible. Three articles reported that AT lightened caregiver assistance in the areas of mobility, self- care and social function. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that AT has a positive impact on children with physical impairments and their caregivers. Future studies in this area could include valid and reliable outcome measures of AT use and the psychological impacts of AT on caring for a child with physical impairments.
Authors: Giulio E Lancioni; Nirbhay N Singh; Mark F O'Reilly; Jeff Sigafoos; Gloria Alberti; Viviana Perilli; Valeria Chiariello; Giovanna Grillo; Cosimo Turi Journal: Int J Dev Disabil Date: 2018-11-18
Authors: Zara Trafford; Erna van der Westhuizen; Shona McDonald; Margi Linegar; Leslie Swartz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 3.390