BACKGROUND: Complete clearance of port-wine stains (PWS) is difficult to achieve, mainly because of the resistance of small blood vessels to laser irradiation. Indocyanine green (ICG)-augmented diode laser treatment (ICG+DL) may overcome this problem. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of ICG+DL therapy of PWS and to compare the safety and efficacy of ICG+DL with the standard treatment, flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser (FPDL). METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled clinical study, 31 patients with PWS were treated with FPDL (λ(em)=585 nm, 6 J cm(-2) , 0.45 ms pulse duration) and ICG+DL (λ(em)=810 nm, 20-50 J cm(-2) , 10-25 ms pulse duration, ICG-concentration: 2 mg kg(-1) body weight) in a split-face modus in one single treatment setting that included histological examination (haematoxylin and eosin, CD34). Two blinded investigators and the patients assessed clearance rate, cosmetic appearance and side-effects up to 3 months after treatment. RESULTS:ICG+DL therapy induced photocoagulation of medium and large blood vessels (>20 μm diameter) but not of small blood vessels. According to the investigators' assessment, clearance rates and cosmetic appearance were better after ICG+DL therapy than after FPDL treatment (P=0.114, P=0.291, respectively), although not up to a statistically significant level, whereas patients considered these parameters superior (P=0.003, P=0.006, respectively). On a 10-point scale indicating pain during treatment, patients rated ICG+DL to be more painful (5.81 ± 2.12) than FPDL treatment (1.61 ± 1.84). CONCLUSION:ICG+DL represents a new and promising treatment modality for PWS, but laser parameters and ICG concentration need to be further optimized.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Complete clearance of port-wine stains (PWS) is difficult to achieve, mainly because of the resistance of small blood vessels to laser irradiation. Indocyanine green (ICG)-augmented diode laser treatment (ICG+DL) may overcome this problem. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of ICG+DL therapy of PWS and to compare the safety and efficacy of ICG+DL with the standard treatment, flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser (FPDL). METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled clinical study, 31 patients with PWS were treated with FPDL (λ(em)=585 nm, 6 J cm(-2) , 0.45 ms pulse duration) and ICG+DL (λ(em)=810 nm, 20-50 J cm(-2) , 10-25 ms pulse duration, ICG-concentration: 2 mg kg(-1) body weight) in a split-face modus in one single treatment setting that included histological examination (haematoxylin and eosin, CD34). Two blinded investigators and the patients assessed clearance rate, cosmetic appearance and side-effects up to 3 months after treatment. RESULTS:ICG+DL therapy induced photocoagulation of medium and large blood vessels (>20 μm diameter) but not of small blood vessels. According to the investigators' assessment, clearance rates and cosmetic appearance were better after ICG+DL therapy than after FPDL treatment (P=0.114, P=0.291, respectively), although not up to a statistically significant level, whereas patients considered these parameters superior (P=0.003, P=0.006, respectively). On a 10-point scale indicating pain during treatment, patients rated ICG+DL to be more painful (5.81 ± 2.12) than FPDL treatment (1.61 ± 1.84). CONCLUSION:ICG+DL represents a new and promising treatment modality for PWS, but laser parameters and ICG concentration need to be further optimized.
Authors: M Ingmar van Raath; Sandeep Chohan; Albert Wolkerstorfer; Chantal M A M van der Horst; Jacqueline Limpens; Xuan Huang; Baoyue Ding; Gert Storm; René R W J van der Hulst; Michal Heger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240