Literature DB >> 22435848

You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation.

Marco Brambilla1, Simona Sacchi, Patrice Rusconi, Paolo Cherubini, Vincent Y Yzerbyt.   

Abstract

Research has shown that warmth and competence are core dimensions on which perceivers judge others and that warmth has a primary role at various phases of impression formation. Three studies explored whether the two components of warmth (i.e., sociability and morality) have distinct roles in predicting the global impression of social groups. In Study 1 (N= 105) and Study 2 (N= 112), participants read an immigration scenario depicting an unfamiliar social group in terms of high (vs. low) morality, sociability, and competence. In both studies, participants were asked to report their global impression of the group. Results showed that global evaluations were better predicted by morality than by sociability or competence-trait ascriptions. Study 3 (N= 86) further showed that the effect of moral traits on group global evaluations was mediated by the perception of threat. The importance of these findings for the impression-formation process is discussed.
© 2011 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22435848     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers; Jojanneke van der Toorn; Yavor Paunov; Thed van Leeuwen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

2.  Moral concerns increase attention and response monitoring during IAT performance: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Félice van Nunspeet; Naomi Ellemers; Belle Derks; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Neural dissociations between meaningful and mere inconsistency in impression updating.

Authors:  Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other's pain: an ERP study.

Authors:  Fang Cui; Ning Ma; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Facets of the Fundamental Content Dimensions: Agency with Competence and Assertiveness-Communion with Warmth and Morality.

Authors:  Andrea E Abele; Nicole Hauke; Kim Peters; Eva Louvet; Aleksandra Szymkow; Yanping Duan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-22

6.  You are fair, but I expect you to also behave unfairly: Positive asymmetry in trait-behavior relations for moderate morality information.

Authors:  Patrice Rusconi; Simona Sacchi; Roberta Capellini; Marco Brambilla; Paolo Cherubini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Extracting the Evaluations of Stereotypes: Bi-factor Model of the Stereotype Content Structure.

Authors:  Pablo Sayans-Jiménez; Isabel Cuadrado; Antonio J Rojas; Juan R Barrada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-04

8.  Attitudes Formation by Small but Meaningful Personal Information.

Authors:  Jaejoong Kim; Sang Won Lee; Minwook Kwak; Kyueun Lee; Bumseok Jeong
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  The Reputational Consequences of Generalized Trust.

Authors:  Anthony M Evans; Philippe P F M van de Calseyde
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-12-18

10.  Once Dishonest, Always Dishonest? The Impact of Perceived Pervasiveness of Moral Evaluations of the Self on Motivation to Restore a Moral Reputation.

Authors:  Stefano Pagliaro; Naomi Ellemers; Manuela Barreto; Cecilia Di Cesare
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.