Literature DB >> 22435818

G-protein-coupled receptor dynamics: dimerization and activation models compared with experiment.

Bruck Taddese1, Lisa M Simpson, Ian D Wall, Frank E Blaney, Nathan J Kidley, Henry S X Clark, Richard E Smith, Graham J G Upton, Paul R Gouldson, George Psaroudakis, Robert P Bywater, Christopher A Reynolds.   

Abstract

Our previously derived models of the active state of the β2-adrenergic receptor are compared with recently published X-ray crystallographic structures of activated GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors). These molecular dynamics-based models using experimental data derived from biophysical experiments on activation were used to restrain the receptor to an active state that gave high enrichment for agonists in virtual screening. The β2-adrenergic receptor active model and X-ray structures are in good agreement over both the transmembrane region and the orthosteric binding site, although in some regions the active model is more similar to the active rhodopsin X-ray structures. The general features of the microswitches were well reproduced, but with minor differences, partly because of the unexpected X-ray results for the rotamer toggle switch. In addition, most of the interacting residues between the receptor and the G-protein were identified. This analysis of the modelling has also given important additional insight into GPCR dimerization: re-analysis of results on photoaffinity analogues of rhodopsin provided additional evidence that TM4 (transmembrane helix 4) resides at the dimer interface and that ligands such as bivalent ligands may pass between the mobile helices. A comparison, and discussion, is also carried out between the use of implicit and explicit solvent for active-state modelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22435818     DOI: 10.1042/BST20110755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans        ISSN: 0300-5127            Impact factor:   5.407


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chemistry of the retinoid (visual) cycle.

Authors:  Philip D Kiser; Marcin Golczak; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Beyond standard molecular dynamics: investigating the molecular mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptors with enhanced molecular dynamics methods.

Authors:  Jennifer M Johnston; Marta Filizola
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Similarity between class A and class B G-protein-coupled receptors exemplified through calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor modelling and mutagenesis studies.

Authors:  Shabana Vohra; Bruck Taddese; Alex C Conner; David R Poyner; Debbie L Hay; James Barwell; Philip J Reeves; Graham J G Upton; Christopher A Reynolds
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Do plants contain g protein-coupled receptors?

Authors:  Bruck Taddese; Graham J G Upton; Gregory R Bailey; Siân R D Jordan; Nuradin Y Abdulla; Philip J Reeves; Christopher A Reynolds
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Towards structural systems pharmacology to study complex diseases and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Xiaoxia Ge; Hepan Tan; Li Xie; Yinliang Zhang; Thomas Hart; Xiaowei Yang; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.