BACKGROUND: Television viewing time is associated cross-sectionally with abnormal glucose tolerance and diabetes risk; however, the impact of changes in television viewing time on glycaemic measures is less understood. We examined relationships of 5-year change in television viewing time with 5-year change in glucose homeostasis markers. METHODS: Participants in the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study with data available at the 1999-2000 baseline and the 2004-2005 follow-up were included (4870; 45% men). Television viewing time (h/week) was assessed by questionnaire. Fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin and 2-h plasma glucose were obtained from an oral glucose tolerance test. Beta-cell function and insulin resistance were ascertained using the homeostasis model assessment 2-calculator. Associations of change in television viewing time with changes in glucose homeostasis markers were examined using linear regression models [β-coefficients (95% CI)]. Adjustments included baseline measures of age, television viewing time and glycaemic marker, and baseline and 5-year change in diet quality, energy intake, physical activity and waist circumference. RESULTS: For every 5-h per week increase in television viewing time from baseline to 5-year follow-up, changes in glucose homeostasis markers were observed: among women there was a significant increase in fasting plasma glucose [0.01 (0.00-0.02) mmol/l] insulin resistance [0.03 (0.01-0.05)] and insulin secretion [1.07 (0.02-2.12) %]; insulin levels increased [men: 1.20 (0.30-2.09); women: 1.06 (0.32-1.80) pmol/l]; in men, 2-h plasma glucose levels increased [0.06 (0.01-0.1) mmol/l]. CONCLUSION: Five-year increases in television viewing time were associated adversely with changes in glucose homeostasis markers. These findings add to earlier cross-sectional evidence that television viewing time can be associated with biomarkers of diabetes risk.
BACKGROUND: Television viewing time is associated cross-sectionally with abnormal glucose tolerance and diabetes risk; however, the impact of changes in television viewing time on glycaemic measures is less understood. We examined relationships of 5-year change in television viewing time with 5-year change in glucose homeostasis markers. METHODS: Participants in the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study with data available at the 1999-2000 baseline and the 2004-2005 follow-up were included (4870; 45% men). Television viewing time (h/week) was assessed by questionnaire. Fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin and 2-h plasma glucose were obtained from an oral glucose tolerance test. Beta-cell function and insulin resistance were ascertained using the homeostasis model assessment 2-calculator. Associations of change in television viewing time with changes in glucose homeostasis markers were examined using linear regression models [β-coefficients (95% CI)]. Adjustments included baseline measures of age, television viewing time and glycaemic marker, and baseline and 5-year change in diet quality, energy intake, physical activity and waist circumference. RESULTS: For every 5-h per week increase in television viewing time from baseline to 5-year follow-up, changes in glucose homeostasis markers were observed: among women there was a significant increase in fasting plasma glucose [0.01 (0.00-0.02) mmol/l] insulin resistance [0.03 (0.01-0.05)] and insulin secretion [1.07 (0.02-2.12) %]; insulin levels increased [men: 1.20 (0.30-2.09); women: 1.06 (0.32-1.80) pmol/l]; in men, 2-h plasma glucose levels increased [0.06 (0.01-0.1) mmol/l]. CONCLUSION: Five-year increases in television viewing time were associated adversely with changes in glucose homeostasis markers. These findings add to earlier cross-sectional evidence that television viewing time can be associated with biomarkers of diabetes risk.
Authors: Sarah J O Nomura; Chiranjeev Dash; Lynn Rosenberg; Julie Palmer; Lucile L Adams-Campbell Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Kerem Shuval; Loretta DiPietro; Celette Sugg Skinner; Carolyn E Barlow; Jay Morrow; Robert Goldsteen; Harold W Kohl Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Raheem J Paxton; Su Yon Jung; Mara Z Vitolins; Jenifer Fenton; Electra Paskett; Michael Pollak; Jennifer Hays-Grudo; Stephen D Hursting; Shine Chang Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Sarah J O Nomura; Chiranjeev Dash; Vanessa B Sheppard; Deborah Bowen; Matthew Allison; Wendy Barrington; Rowan Chlebowski; Mace Coday; Lifang Hou; Barbara Howard; Michael LaMonte; JoAnn E Manson; Marian L Neuhouser; Electra Paskett; Maryam Sattari; Marcia Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lucile L Adams-Campbell Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Harri Helajärvi; Tom Rosenström; Katja Pahkala; Mika Kähönen; Terho Lehtimäki; Olli J Heinonen; Mervi Oikonen; Tuija Tammelin; Jorma S A Viikari; Olli T Raitakari Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah Kozey Keadle; Hannah Arem; Steven C Moore; Joshua N Sampson; Charles E Matthews Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 6.457