| Literature DB >> 22435003 |
Mohammed Hussein1, Challi Jira, Belaineh Girma.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coverage assessment of prevention of Pregnant Mother to Child Transmission (PMTCT) of HIV service is useful to measure the health system effort or performance of health service delivery function and to influence decisions. The objective of this study was to assess effective coverage level for prevention of Pregnant Mother to Child Transmission services in Jimma University Hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Effective coverage; PMTCT; availability; continuity; quality; services; utilization
Year: 2011 PMID: 22435003 PMCID: PMC3275881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ethiop J Health Sci ISSN: 1029-1857
Socio demographic characteristics of PMTCT utilized mothers, Jimma zone, 2006.
| Variables | Frequency | Percent (%) |
| Age | ||
| 15–19 | 290 | 19.7 |
| 20–24 | 444 | 30.2 |
| 25–29 | 296 | 20.1 |
| 30–34 | 247 | 16.8 |
| 35–39 | 140 | 9.5 |
| 40–44 | 54 | 3.7 |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 949 | 64.5 |
| Rural | 522 | 35.5 |
| Marital status | ||
| Never married/Single | 161 | 10.9 |
| Married | 1219 | 82.8 |
| Separated/divorced | 92 | 6.3 |
| Educational status | ||
| No formal education | 388 | 26.4 |
| Primary | 801 | 54.4 |
| Secondary | 189 | 12.8 |
| Tertiary | 94 | 6.4 |
| Occupation | ||
| Unemployed including housewife | 977 | 66.4 |
| Employed | 266 | 18.1 |
| Merchant | 98 | 6.7 |
| Student | 114 | 7.7 |
| Peasant | 17 | 1.2 |
| Religion | ||
| Muslim | 546 | 37.1 |
| Orthodox | 715 | 48.6 |
| Protestant | 154 | 10.5 |
| Catholic | 54 | 3.7 |
| Other | 3 | 0.2 |
Other includes Jehovah and unspecified religions
Prevalence of HIV sero positivity of PMTCT utilized clients by socio-demographic variables, Jimma Zone, 2006.
| HIV sero-status | Bi-variate OR | Adjusted OR | |||
| Variables | Positive N (%) | Negative | Total | ||
| Residence | |||||
| Urban | 52(5.5) | 897(94.5) | 949(100%) | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | 49(9.4) | 474(90.6) | 523(100%) | 1.79(1.19–2.68) | 1.75(1.16–2.64) |
| Total | 101(6.9) | 1371(93.1) | 1472(100%) | ||
| Occupation | |||||
| Unemployed | 80(8.2) | 896(91.8) | 976(100%) | 1 | 1 |
| Employed + | 21(4.2) | 475(95.8) | 496(100%) | 0.49(.30 –.81) | 0.50(.30 –.83) |
| Total | 101(6.9) | 1371(93.1) | 1472(100%) | ||
| Edu. status | |||||
| No education | 72(6.6) | 1012(73.9) | 1084(100%) | 1 | |
| Some + | 29(28.7) | 359(26.1) | 388(100%) | 0.88(.56–1.37) | |
| Total | 101(6.9) | 1371(93.1) | 1472(100%) | ||
| Marital status | |||||
| Never married | 7(4.3) | 154(95.7) | 161(100%) | 1 | |
| Ever married | 94(7.2) | 1216(92.8) | 1310(100%) | 1.70(.77–3.73) | |
| Total | 101(6.9) | 1370(93.1) | 1471(100%) | ||
| Age | |||||
| 15–29 | 86(8.3) | 944(91.7) | 1030(100%) | 1 | 1 |
| 30–44 | 15(3.4) | 425(96.6) | 440(100%) | 0.39(.22 –.68) | 0.39(.23 –.69) |
| Total | 101(6.9) | 1369(93.1) | 1470(100%) | ||
P-value <0.005
P-value <0.001