Literature DB >> 22434587

Dependence of paranodal junctional gap width on transverse bands.

Jack Rosenbluth1, Chris Petzold, Elior Peles.   

Abstract

Mouse mutants with paranodal junctional (PNJ) defects display variable degrees of neurological impairment. In this study we compare control paranodes with those from three mouse mutants that differ with respect to a conspicuous PNJ component, the transverse bands (TBs). We hypothesize that TBs link the apposed junctional membranes together at a fixed distance and thereby determine the width of the junctional gap, which may in turn determine the extent to which nodal action currents can be short-circuited underneath the myelin sheath. Electron micrographs of aldehyde-fixed control PNJs, in which TBs are abundant, show a consistent junctional gap of ∼3.5 nm. In Caspr-null PNJs, which lack TBs entirely, the gap is wider (∼6-7 nm) and more variable. In CST-null PNJs, which have only occasional TBs, the mean PNJ gap width is comparable to that in Caspr-null mice. In the shaking mutant, in contrast, which has approximately 60% of the normal complement of TBs, mean PNJ gap width is not significantly different from that in controls. Correspondingly, shaking mice are much less impaired neurologically than either Caspr-null or CST-null mice. We conclude that in the absence or gross diminution of TBs, mean PNJ gap width increases significantly and suggest that this difference could underlie some of the neurological impairment seen in those mutants. Surprisingly, even in the absence of TBs, paranodes are to some extent maintained in their usual form, implying that in addition to TBs, other factors govern the formation and maintenance of overall paranodal structure.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22434587     DOI: 10.1002/cne.23105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  4 in total

1.  Caspr and caspr2 are required for both radial and longitudinal organization of myelinated axons.

Authors:  Aaron Gordon; Konstantin Adamsky; Anya Vainshtein; Shahar Frechter; Jeffrey L Dupree; Jack Rosenbluth; Elior Peles
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Nodes of Ranvier during development and repair in the CNS.

Authors:  Catherine Lubetzki; Nathalie Sol-Foulon; Anne Desmazières
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  The polarity protein Scribble regulates myelination and remyelination in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Andrew A Jarjour; Amanda Boyd; Lukas E Dow; Rebecca K Holloway; Sandra Goebbels; Patrick O Humbert; Anna Williams; Charles ffrench-Constant
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 4.  Structure and function of the contactin-associated protein family in myelinated axons and their relationship with nerve diseases.

Authors:  Yan Zou; Wei-Feng Zhang; Hai-Ying Liu; Xia Li; Xing Zhang; Xiao-Fang Ma; Yang Sun; Shi-Yi Jiang; Quan-Hong Ma; De-En Xu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.135

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.