INTRODUCTION: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has a poor outcome, particularly attributed to progressive injury after the initial incident. Several studies suggest a critical role for inflammation in lesion progression after SAH. Our goal was to test whether treatment with anti-inflammatory interferon-β, which has shown promise as a therapeutic agent in experimental ischaemic stroke, can protect the brain after SAH. METHODS: SAH was induced in adult male Wistar rats by puncturing the intracranial bifurcation of the right internal carotid artery. Treatment effects of daily interferon-β (n = 16) or vehicle (n = 14) injections were serially evaluated with multiparametric MRI and behavioral tests from day 0 to 7, in compliance with recent recommendations for pre-clinical drug testing. Outcome measures included neurological status, brain lesion volume, blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage, and levels of inflammatory markers. RESULTS: In animals that survived up to 7 days post-SAH, we found no significant differences between vehicle- and interferon-β-treated animals with respect to final neurological score (14.3 ± 1.0 vs. 13.0 ± 2.2), brain lesion size on T(2)-weighted MR images (59 ± 83 vs. 124 ± 99 mm(3)), BBB leakage (0.26 ± 0.05 vs. 0.22 ± 0.08 contrast-induced relative MR signal change), upregulation of brain RNA for cytokines, chemokines and cell adhesion molecules, and increased neutrophil activation. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previously published findings in experimental ischemic stroke models, interferon-β has no clear efficacy to protect the brain after SAH. In line with recent highlighting of the significance of negative findings, our data currently do not recommend clinical testing of interferon-β to prevent neurological damage in SAH patients.
INTRODUCTION:Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has a poor outcome, particularly attributed to progressive injury after the initial incident. Several studies suggest a critical role for inflammation in lesion progression after SAH. Our goal was to test whether treatment with anti-inflammatory interferon-β, which has shown promise as a therapeutic agent in experimental ischaemic stroke, can protect the brain after SAH. METHODS:SAH was induced in adult male Wistar rats by puncturing the intracranial bifurcation of the right internal carotid artery. Treatment effects of daily interferon-β (n = 16) or vehicle (n = 14) injections were serially evaluated with multiparametric MRI and behavioral tests from day 0 to 7, in compliance with recent recommendations for pre-clinical drug testing. Outcome measures included neurological status, brain lesion volume, blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage, and levels of inflammatory markers. RESULTS: In animals that survived up to 7 days post-SAH, we found no significant differences between vehicle- and interferon-β-treated animals with respect to final neurological score (14.3 ± 1.0 vs. 13.0 ± 2.2), brain lesion size on T(2)-weighted MR images (59 ± 83 vs. 124 ± 99 mm(3)), BBB leakage (0.26 ± 0.05 vs. 0.22 ± 0.08 contrast-induced relative MR signal change), upregulation of brain RNA for cytokines, chemokines and cell adhesion molecules, and increased neutrophil activation. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previously published findings in experimental ischemic stroke models, interferon-β has no clear efficacy to protect the brain after SAH. In line with recent highlighting of the significance of negative findings, our data currently do not recommend clinical testing of interferon-β to prevent neurological damage in SAHpatients.
Authors: T Olsson; S Kelic; C Edlund; M Bakhiet; B Höjeberg; P H van der Meide; A Ljungdahl; K Kristensson Journal: Eur J Immunol Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: W M van den Bergh; J Schepers; W B Veldhuis; K Nicolay; C A F Tulleken; G J E Rinkel Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2005-05-25 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Sarah Floris; Sigrid R Ruuls; Anne Wierinckx; Susanne M A van der Pol; Ed Döpp; Peter H van der Meide; Christine D Dijkstra; Helga E De Vries Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Wouter B Veldhuis; Joris W Derksen; Sarah Floris; Peter H Van Der Meide; Helga E De Vries; Janneke Schepers; Ine M P Vos; Christien D Dijkstra; L Jaap Kappelle; Klaas Nicolay; Peter R Bär Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: H Bart van der Worp; David W Howells; Emily S Sena; Michelle J Porritt; Sarah Rewell; Victoria O'Collins; Malcolm R Macleod Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Brenda Marsh; Susan L Stevens; Amy E B Packard; Banu Gopalan; Brian Hunter; Philberta Y Leung; Christina A Harrington; Mary P Stenzel-Poore Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-08-05 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Elke Kooijman; Cora H Nijboer; Cindy T J van Velthoven; Wouter Mol; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Jozef Kesecioglu; Cobi J Heijnen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana R Inácio; Yawei Liu; Bettina H Clausen; Martina Svensson; Krzysztof Kucharz; Yiyi Yang; Totte Stankovich; Reza Khorooshi; Kate L Lambertsen; Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Tomas Deierborg Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 8.322