Literature DB >> 22434535

Socioeconomic position and stage of cervical cancer in Danish women diagnosed 2005 to 2009.

Else Ibfelt1, Susanne K Kjær, Christoffer Johansen, Claus Høgdall, Marianne Steding-Jessen, Kirsten Frederiksen, Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen, Merete Osler, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reduce social disparities in cervical cancer survival, it is important to understand the mechanisms by which social position influence cancer prognosis. We investigated the relations between socioeconomic factors, comorbidity, time since last Papanicolau smear, and stage at diagnosis in Danish women with cervical cancer.
METHODS: We identified 1,651 cervical cancer cases diagnosed 2005 to 2009 from the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database. Date of diagnosis, clinical cancer stage, tumor histology, and treating hospital were retrieved; Pap smear registrations were obtained from the Danish Pathology Register; data on comorbid conditions from the Danish National Patients Register; and data on education, income, and cohabitation from Statistics Denmark. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the relations between socioeconomic factors and cancer stage in a four-step model, with stepwise inclusion of mediators.
RESULTS: The risk for advanced (stage II-IV) compared with early-stage cancer (stage I) was increased for women with short and medium education (OR = 2.40; 1.67-3.45 and 1.76; 1.44-2.16), women living without a partner (OR = 1.31; 1.10-1.55), and older women (OR = 1.07; 1.06-1.08 increase per year). The relations between socioeconomic factors and cancer stage were partly mediated by time since last Pap smear test and to a lesser extent by comorbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Shorter education, living alone, and older age were related to advanced stage cervical cancer, due partly to Pap smear testing and less to comorbidity. IMPACT: It is relevant to further investigate how to decrease delay in cervical cancer diagnosis among disadvantaged groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22434535     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  12 in total

1.  Screening histories and contact with physicians as determinants of cervical cancer risk in Montreal, Quebec.

Authors:  A R Spence; A Alobaid; P Drouin; P Goggin; L Gilbert; D Provencher; P Tousignant; J A Hanley; E L Franco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before-after study in Danish general practice.

Authors:  Bettina Kjær Kristiansen; Berit Andersen; Flemming Bro; Hans Svanholm; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The value of improving failures within a cervical cancer screening program: an example from Norway.

Authors:  Emily A Burger; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Gudrun Broberg; Jiangrong Wang; Anna-Lena Östberg; Annsofie Adolfsson; Szilard Nemes; Pär Sparén; Björn Strander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Socioeconomic position and survival after cervical cancer: influence of cancer stage, comorbidity and smoking among Danish women diagnosed between 2005 and 2010.

Authors:  E H Ibfelt; S K Kjær; C Høgdall; M Steding-Jessen; T K Kjær; M Osler; C Johansen; K Frederiksen; S O Dalton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Sociodemographic factors associated with pap test adherence and cervical dysplasia in surgically sterilized women.

Authors:  Katherine C Whitehouse; Jane R Montealegre; Michele Follen; Michael E Scheurer; Kjersti Aagaard
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2014-04

7.  Cancer awareness and socio-economic position: results from a population-based study in Denmark.

Authors:  Line Hvidberg; Anette Fischer Pedersen; Christian Nielsen Wulff; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Cervical cancer screening history prior to a diagnosis of cervical cancer in Danish women aged 60 years and older-A national cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Hammer; Vibeke Soegaard; Rikke D Maimburg; Jan Blaakaer
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Socioeconomic factors affect treatment delivery for patients with low grade glioma: a Swedish population-based study.

Authors:  Louise Carstam; Isabelle Rydén; Sasha Gulati; Bertil Rydenhag; Roger Henriksson; Øyvind Salvesen; Anja Smits; Asgeir Store Jakola
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Screening history and FIGO-stages among Danish women with cervical cancer in 2012-2014: a register-based study.

Authors:  Abir Khalil Bchtawi; Sinem Saritas; Doris Schledermann; René dePont Christensen; Kirsten Marie Jochumsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.