Literature DB >> 22434461

Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon.

J P Holland1, D J Langton, M Hashmi.   

Abstract

We present the clinical results and survivorship of consecutive 100 Birmingham Hip Resurfacings in 90 patients at a minimum follow-up of ten years. All procedures were carried out by an independent surgeon who commenced a prospective study in 1998. Patients were assessed clinically using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, Short-Form 36, Harris hip score and University of California, Los Angeles activity score. Radiological analysis was performed by an independent observer and blood metal ion levels concentrations were measured at ten years post-operatively in 62 patients. The median acetabular component inclination was 46.2° (34° to 59°) and anteversion 11.0° (0° to 30°). The median chromium concentration in the unilateral group was 1.74 (0.41 to 15.23) and for the bilateral group was 2.98 (1.57 to 18.01). The equivalent values for cobalt were 1.67 (0.54 to 20.4) and 1.88 (1.38 to 19.32). In total there were eight failures giving an overall survival at ten years of 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.7 to 97.3). BHR in male patients had an improved survivorship of 94.6% (95% CI 89.4 to 100) compared with females at 84.6% (95% CI 70.7 to 98.5), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.119). Four of the nine BHRs with a bearing diameter of 42 mm failed. The overall results were consistent with data produced from other centres in that the clinical outcome of large male patients was extremely encouraging, whereas the survival of the smaller joints was less satisfactory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22434461     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.27895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  25 in total

1.  CORR Insights ®: Hip resurfacing does not improve proprioception compared with THA.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Letter to the editor: the withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at ten years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Petra Elo; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  Md Quamar Azam; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Sukesh Rao Sankineani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.

Authors:  Asaad Asaad; Alister Hart; Michael M Y Khoo; Kevin Ilo; Gavin Schaller; Jonathan D J Black; Sarah Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  Brain structure and function in patients after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  M J Clark; J R Prentice; N Hoggard; M N Paley; M Hadjivassiliou; J M Wilkinson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Fan Liu; Ya-Ke Liu; Yue Lu; Hua Xu; Yi Cao; Zhen-Yu Zhou; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.