Literature DB >> 22434360

Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: final results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

Susan Urba1, Carla M L van Herpen, Tarini Prasad Sahoo, Dong M Shin, Lisa Licitra, Klara Mezei, Christoph Reuter, Ricardo Hitt, Francesca Russo, Shao-Chun Chang, Anwar M Hossain, Bente Frimodt-Moller, Andrew Koustenis, Ruey-Long Hong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is associated with poor survival. Platinum-based chemotherapy is often a first-line treatment. Pemetrexed has shown single-agent activity in SCCHN and in combination with cisplatin for other tumors. This trial examined the efficacy of pemetrexed-cisplatin for SCCHN.
METHODS: In a double-blind phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease were randomized to pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) ) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) ; n = 398) or placebo plus cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) ; n = 397) to assess overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: Median OS was 7.3 months in the pemetrexed-cisplatin arm and 6.3 months in the placebo-cisplatin arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.02; P = .082). Median progression-free survival (PFS, months) was similar in both treatment arms (pemetrexed-cisplatin, 3.6; placebo-cisplatin, 2.8; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.03; P = .166). Among patients with performance status 0 or 1, pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 347) led to longer OS and PFS than placebo-cisplatin (n = 343; 8.4 vs 6.7 months; HR, 0.83; P = .026; 4.0 vs 3.0 months; HR, 0.84; P = .044, respectively). Among patients with oropharyngeal cancers, pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 86) resulted in longer OS and PFS than placebo-cisplatin (n = 106; 9.9 vs 6.1 months; HR, 0.59; P = .002; 4.0 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.73; P = .047, respectively). Pemetrexed-cisplatin toxicity was consistent with studies in other tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed-cisplatin compared with placebo-cisplatin did not significantly improve survival for the intent-to-treat population. However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, pemetrexed-cisplatin showed OS and PFS advantage for patients with performance status 0 or 1 or oropharyngeal cancers.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22434360     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Phase II randomized trial of radiation therapy, cetuximab, and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Argiris; J E Bauman; J Ohr; W E Gooding; D E Heron; U Duvvuri; G J Kubicek; D M Posluszny; M Vassilakopoulou; S Kim; J R Grandis; J T Johnson; M K Gibson; D A Clump; J T Flaherty; S I Chiosea; B Branstetter; R L Ferris
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy Options for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Kelsey P Pendleton; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ther       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandro Guidi; Carla Codecà; Daris Ferrari
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Carboplatin-pemetrexed in treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic cancers of the head and neck; superior outcomes in oropharyngeal primaries.

Authors:  Binu Malhotra; Emily Light Bellile; Nghia Pham Trung Nguyen; Vicki Kay Fung; Matthew Slack; Rebecca Bilich; Silvana Papagerakis; Francis Worden
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Jin; Bin Zhang; Lu Zhang; Wenhui Huang; Xiaokai Mo; Qiuyin Chen; Fei Wang; Zhuozhi Chen; Minmin Li; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  Comparison of pemetrexed plus cisplatin with gemcitabine plus docetaxel in refractory/metastatic osteosarcoma: Clinical outcomes from a retrospective database monitored in a single institute.

Authors:  Wen-Xi Yu; Li-Na Tang; Feng Lin; Yang Yao; Zan Shen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Synergistic effect of combinatorial treatment with curcumin and mitomycin C on the induction of apoptosis of breast cancer cells: a cDNA microarray analysis.

Authors:  Qian-Mei Zhou; Qi-Long Chen; Jia Du; Xiu-Feng Wang; Yi-Yu Lu; Hui Zhang; Shi-Bing Su
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Evaluation of pemetrexed and etoposide as therapeutic regimens for human papillomavirus-positive oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Yi Rang Kim; Bada Lee; Mi Ran Byun; Jong Kil Lee; Jin Woo Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.