Literature DB >> 22433969

Application of MassSQUIRM for quantitative measurements of lysine demethylase activity.

Lauren P Blair1, Nathan L Avaritt, Alan J Tackett.   

Abstract

Recently, epigenetic regulators have been discovered as key players in many different diseases (1-3). As a result, these enzymes are prime targets for small molecule studies and drug development( 4). Many epigenetic regulators have only recently been discovered and are still in the process of being classified. Among these enzymes are lysine demethylases which remove methyl groups from lysines on histones and other proteins. Due to the novel nature of this class of enzymes, few assays have been developed to study their activity. This has been a road block to both the classification and high throughput study of histone demethylases. Currently, very few demethylase assays exist. Those that do exist tend to be qualitative in nature and cannot simultaneously discern between the different lysine methylation states (un-, mono-, di- and tri-). Mass spectrometry is commonly used to determine demethylase activity but current mass spectrometric assays do not address whether differentially methylated peptides ionize differently. Differential ionization of methylated peptides makes comparing methylation states difficult and certainly not quantitative (Figure 1A). Thus available assays are not optimized for the comprehensive analysis of demethylase activity. Here we describe a method called MassSQUIRM (mass spectrometric quantitation using isotopic reductive methylation) that is based on reductive methylation of amine groups with deuterated formaldehyde to force all lysines to be di-methylated, thus making them essentially the same chemical species and therefore ionize the same (Figure 1B). The only chemical difference following the reductive methylation is hydrogen and deuterium, which does not affect MALDI ionization efficiencies. The MassSQUIRM assay is specific for demethylase reaction products with un-, mono- or di-methylated lysines. The assay is also applicable to lysine methyltransferases giving the same reaction products. Here, we use a combination of reductive methylation chemistry and MALDI mass spectrometry to measure the activity of LSD1, a lysine demethylase capable of removing di- and mono-methyl groups, on a synthetic peptide substrate (5). This assay is simple and easily amenable to any lab with access to a MALDI mass spectrometer in lab or through a proteomics facility. The assay has ~8-fold dynamic range and is readily scalable to plate format (5).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433969      PMCID: PMC3460583          DOI: 10.3791/3604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

1.  Yng1 PHD finger binding to H3 trimethylated at K4 promotes NuA3 HAT activity at K14 of H3 and transcription at a subset of targeted ORFs.

Authors:  Sean D Taverna; Serge Ilin; Richard S Rogers; Jason C Tanny; Heather Lavender; Haitao Li; Lindsey Baker; John Boyle; Lauren P Blair; Brian T Chait; Dinshaw J Patel; John D Aitchison; Alan J Tackett; C David Allis
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Chromatin modifications and their function.

Authors:  Tony Kouzarides
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape.

Authors:  Aaron D Goldberg; C David Allis; Emily Bernstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  CYP2E1 active site residues in substrate recognition sequence 5 identified by photoaffinity labeling and homology modeling.

Authors:  Samuel L Collom; Arvind P Jamakhandi; Alan J Tackett; Anna Radominska-Pandya; Grover P Miller
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 5.  Chemical probes for histone-modifying enzymes.

Authors:  Philip A Cole
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 15.040

6.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yta7 regulates histone gene expression.

Authors:  Angeline Gradolatto; Richard S Rogers; Heather Lavender; Sean D Taverna; C David Allis; John D Aitchison; Alan J Tackett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  MassSQUIRM: An assay for quantitative measurement of lysine demethylase activity.

Authors:  Lauren P Blair; Nathan L Avaritt; Rong Huang; Phillip A Cole; Sean D Taverna; Alan J Tackett
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1.

Authors:  Yujiang Shi; Fei Lan; Caitlin Matson; Peter Mulligan; Johnathan R Whetstine; Philip A Cole; Robert A Casero; Yang Shi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Epigenetic Regulation by Lysine Demethylase 5 (KDM5) Enzymes in Cancer.

Authors:  Lauren P Blair; Jian Cao; Mike Ran Zou; Joyce Sayegh; Qin Yan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor.

Authors:  I Rayment; W R Rypniewski; K Schmidt-Bäse; R Smith; D R Tomchick; M M Benning; D A Winkelmann; G Wesenberg; H M Holden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-02       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  LSD1 Histone Demethylase Assays and Inhibition.

Authors:  D Hayward; P A Cole
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.600

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.