Literature DB >> 22433506

Comparison of 3 fusion techniques in the treatment of the degenerative cervical spine disease. Is stand-alone autograft really the "gold standard?": prospective study with 2-year follow-up.

Petr Vanek1, Ondrej Bradac, Patricia DeLacy, Karel Saur, Tomas Belsan, Vladimir Benes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the 3 different methods of interbody fusion of the cervical spine-autograft in stand-alone technique, autograft with anterior plate, and polyetheretherketone cage supported by anterior plate. The clinical and radiological data obtained were analyzed and discussed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although degenerative cervical spine disease has been treated by an anterior approach for more than 50 years, there is not one generally accepted operative approach. There is a very low-quality evidence of little or no difference in pain relief between each of the techniques. Iliac crest autograft still seems to be the "gold standard" for interbody fusion.
METHODS: Prospective study collecting clinical and radiological data of 81 patients undergoing anterior cervical interbody fusion, in which the interbody fusion of 1 or 2 motion segments from C3 to C7 was done by any of the 3 techniques--stand-alone insertion of autograft (group 1: 28 patients), autograft and anterior plate (group 2: 18 patients), and polyetheretherketone cage filled with beta-tricalcium phosphate and plate (group 3: 29 patients). Patients were followed for 2 years after surgery.
RESULTS: Significant interaction of relative height in the segment and time was found (P < 0.001). The values of the relative height of stand-alone autograft dropped below 95% of initial height and the values of the other 2 groups remained above 105%. Significant interaction of time and group was found for Cobb S angles (P < 0.001). Values of group 1 decreased substantially and remained significantly lower than values of other 2 groups. Fusion rate was 100% in all groups. Neck Disability Index group and time interaction was found (P = 0.023). During postoperative follow-up, group 1 scored in all controls higher than the other 2 groups, but differences were not significant. Visual analogue scale showed effect of time (P < 0.001). This was due to a smaller improvement of patients in group 1 during the whole follow-up in comparison with the other 2 groups. Highest proportion of unsatisfied patients was in group 1 compared with the other 2 groups after 2 years (P = 0.034).
CONCLUSION: Significantly worse radiological and clinical results after 2 years of follow-up were achieved using stand-alone autograft technique in comparison with autograft supported by anterior plating similarly as in comparison with cage implant and anterior plating. Using artificial fusion substrate together with plate and cage can offer the same clinical and radiological results such as iliac autograft and plating. Anterior plating seems to be an important factor influencing the postoperative cervical spine alignment and also the clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433506     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825413fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Dynamic cervical stabilization: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Guy Matgé; Peter Buddenberg; Marcus Eif; Holger Schenke; Joerg Herdmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior decompression and fusion for cervical neuroforaminal stenosis.

Authors:  Andreas Pingel; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anterior decompression and fusion for cervical spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Andreas Pingel; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anterior approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: which? When? How?

Authors:  Sanford E Emery
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Long-term Outcome Following Three-Level Stand-Alone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Is Plating Necessary?

Authors:  Marios Theologou; Theologos Theologou; Nikolaos Skoulios; Maria Mitka; Nikolaos Karanikolas; Antriana Theologou; Eleftheria Georgiou; Slavisa Matejic; Christos Tsonidis
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-08-28

6.  Severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy with complete neurological and neuroradiological recovery within a month after surgery.

Authors:  Marios Theologou; Dimitrios Zevgaridis; Theologos Theologou; Christos Tsonidis
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-24

7.  Correlation of Anterior Interbody Graft Choice With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cervical Spine Trauma.

Authors:  Hui Qing Lee; Chien Yew Kow; Jay Shen Ng; Patrick Chan; Lu Ton; Greg Etherington; Susan Liew; Martin Hunn; Mark Fitzgerald; Jin Tee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-02-05

Review 8.  The new Zero-P implant can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative dysphagia and complications compared with the traditional anterior cage and plate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mengchen Yin; Junming Ma; Quan Huang; Ye Xia; Qixing Shen; Chenglong Zhao; Jun Tao; Ni Chen; Zhingxing Yu; Jie Ye; Wen Mo; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Biomechanical Stability of a Stand-Alone Interbody Spacer in Two-Level and Hybrid Cervical Fusion Constructs.

Authors:  Daniel G Kang; Scott C Wagner; Robert W Tracey; John P Cody; Rachel E Gaume; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-05-31

10.  Zero-profile versus cage-plate interbody fusion system in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Li; Rui Wang; Wei Teng; Jinhua Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.