Literature DB >> 22433496

A survey of current controversies in scoliosis surgery in the United Kingdom.

Anthony L R Michael1, Peter R Loughenbury, Abhay S Rao, Robert A Dunsmuir, Peter A Millner.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A 10-point questionnaire was constructed to identify the philosophy of surgeons on various aspects of scoliosis surgery, such as choice of implant, bone graft, autologous blood transfusion, cord monitoring, and computer-assisted surgery. Comparisons were then made with recommendations published in the spinal literature.
OBJECTIVE: To determine certain aspects of the current practice of scoliosis surgery in the United Kingdom. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Guidelines for good clinical practice in spinal deformity surgery are available in the United Kingdom but do not cover a number of controversial issues.
METHODS: Consultants and fellows attended the 2009 British Scoliosis Society meeting. Fifty questionnaires were completed by 45 consultants and 5 fellows.
RESULTS: All pedicle screw constructs favored by 25 of 50, hybrid 24 of 50 (1 undecided). Posterior construct of fewer than 10 levels, 20 of 50 would not cross-link, 11 of 50 used 1, and 19 of 20 used 2 or more. More than 10 levels 17 of 50 considered cross-links unnecessary, 4 of 50 used 1 and 29 of 50 used 2 or more. Eighty-eight percent preferred titanium alloy implants, whereas others used a mixture of stainless steel and cobalt chrome. When using bone graft, respondents used bone substitutes (24), iliac crest graft (14), allograft (12) and demineralized bone matrix (9) in addition to local bone. Ten of 50 would use recombinant bone morphogenetic protein (3 for revision cases only). Thirty-nine of 50 routinely used intraoperative cell salvage and 4 of 50 never used autologous blood. All used cord monitoring: sensory (19 of 50), motor (2 of 50), and combined (29 of 50). None used computer-aided surgery. Twenty-six operated alone, 12 operated in pairs, and 12 varied depending on type of case.
CONCLUSION: This survey shows interesting variations in scoliosis surgery in the United Kingdom. It may reflect the conflicting evidence in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433496     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825409f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Early outcomes of minimally invasive anterior longitudinal ligament release for correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Armen R Deukmedjian; Elias Dakwar; Amir Ahmadian; Donald A Smith; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-10

2.  Efficacy of Postoperative Pain Management Using Continuous Local Anesthetic Infusion at the Iliac Crest Bone Graft Site in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Parallel, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Cora Bow; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Phoebe Sham; Kin-Cheung Mak; Wai-Yuen Cheung; Yat-Wa Wong; Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung; Jean-Claude Lawmin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-07-16

3.  Experience of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Surgical Correction of Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Review of 124 Patients.

Authors:  Changsheng Yang; Jianru Wang; Zhaomin Zheng; Zhongmin Zhang; Hui Liu; Hua Wang; Zemin Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Shape Loss of Autoclaved, Machine-Bent Cobalt-Chrome and Titanium Spine Surgery Rods.

Authors:  Rob Willson; Haitao Zhou; Sadanand Fulzele; Sean M Mitchell; Norman Chutkan
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-03-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.