Literature DB >> 22433270

Nurse-led case management in the National Health Service: bridging clinical and social worlds.

Jill Manthorpe1, Claire Goodman, Vari Drennan, Sue L Davies, Helen Masey, Heather Gage, Cheryll Scott, Sally Brearley, Steve Iliffe.   

Abstract

AIM: To understand the effects of Nurse Case Managers (NCMs) working in primary care in the English National Health Service (NHS) from multiple perspectives and how this new role impacts on social workers, this paper reports and discusses findings from a multi-level study of the role of NCMs working in primary care in the English NHS.
BACKGROUND: Case management as understood by the NHS is equivalent to key-worker type care management as understood by social workers. However, English health and social services are separately organised with different organisational principles; health services are free at the time of need, whereas social services are means-tested and access is restricted.
METHODS: The study included reviews of evaluations and policy, a national survey of nurse case management in Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and case studies in three purposively selected PCTs. The views and experiences of patients were collected through face-to-face and telephone interviews with 51 older people and their carers, and these experiences are illustrated. In this paper, we further draw on data reporting the views of NCMs and stakeholders from other disciplines and services.
FINDINGS: The opinions of older people receiving nurse case management reveal the value of high intensity support to individuals with major health and social needs. The NCMs' clinical expertise, the improved continuity of care they provided and the psychosocial support they offered, were all emphasised by older people or their carers. NCMs substituted for social workers in some cases, when the older person would not have been eligible for publicly funded social care or had declined it. In other cases, they supplemented social services by identifying unmet needs. In a third category of cases, they may have curtailed social services' involvement by preventing hospital admission and social services' involvement as a consequence. The implications of this from the viewpoint of other study participants are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433270     DOI: 10.1017/S1463423611000533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev        ISSN: 1463-4236            Impact factor:   1.458


  3 in total

1.  Coached, Coordinated, Enhanced Neonatal Transition (CCENT): protocol for a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of transition-to-home support for parents of high-risk infants.

Authors:  Julia Orkin; Nathalie Major; Kayla Esser; Arpita Parmar; Elise Couture; Thierry Daboval; Emily Kieran; Linh Ly; Karel O'Brien; Hema Patel; Anne Synnes; Kate Robson; Lesley Barreira; Wanda L Smith; Sara Rizakos; Andrew R Willan; Maryna Yaskina; Myla E Moretti; Wendy J Ungar; Marilyn Ballantyne; Paige Terrien Church; Eyal Cohen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Evaluation of a nursing and midwifery exchange between rural and metropolitan hospitals: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Amy-Louise Byrne; Clare Harvey; Diane Chamberlain; Adele Baldwin; Brody Heritage; Elspeth Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The use of telephone communication between nurse navigators and their patients.

Authors:  Brody Heritage; Clare Harvey; Janie Brown; Desley Hegney; Eileen Willis; Adele Baldwin; David Heard; Sandy Mclellan; Virginia Clayton; Jamin Claes; Melanie Lang; Venessa Curnow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.