BACKGROUND: Vapour phase spatial repellents deter mosquitoes from attacking one or more humans in a protected space. Simulation models indicate that high coverage of spatial repellents can enhance the impact of long - lasting insecticide nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) where mosquito vectors commonly bite humans outdoors. Here we report a preliminary evaluation of an effective, user-friendly prototype product for delivering spatial repellents to protect against malaria vector mosquitoes. FINDINGS: Protective efficacy of a 4.0 × 0.3 m strip of hessian sacking treated with 10 ml of transfluthrin was evaluated in a 60 m × 2 m × 2.5 m netting tunnel with malaria-free insectary-reared Anopheles arabiensis Patton mosquitoes. Personal protection, in terms of proportional reduction of exposure to bites, was measured by comparing human landing catches of volunteers with treated and untreated strips. A freshly treated hessian strip reduced mosquito attack rate on human volunteers by > 99% and consistently conferred > 90% protective efficacy for a period of 6 months. Over the entire study period, only 22 out of 1400 released mosquitoes bit volunteers using the treated sacking strip while 894 out of 1400 mosquitoes released into cages containing volunteers using an untreated strip fed upon them. CONCLUSION: Locally available natural fibers may be promising absorbent substrates for delivering spatial repellents, such as transfluthrin, to protect against mosquitoes in tropical settings. However, these observations relate to a single prototype specimen of this particular device, therefore, much more detailed, well replicated studies are essential to establish long-term efficacy, effectiveness, practicability and affordability.
BACKGROUND: Vapour phase spatial repellents deter mosquitoes from attacking one or more humans in a protected space. Simulation models indicate that high coverage of spatial repellents can enhance the impact of long - lasting insecticide nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) where mosquito vectors commonly bite humans outdoors. Here we report a preliminary evaluation of an effective, user-friendly prototype product for delivering spatial repellents to protect against malaria vector mosquitoes. FINDINGS: Protective efficacy of a 4.0 × 0.3 m strip of hessian sacking treated with 10 ml of transfluthrin was evaluated in a 60 m × 2 m × 2.5 m netting tunnel with malaria-free insectary-reared Anopheles arabiensis Patton mosquitoes. Personal protection, in terms of proportional reduction of exposure to bites, was measured by comparing human landing catches of volunteers with treated and untreated strips. A freshly treated hessian strip reduced mosquito attack rate on human volunteers by > 99% and consistently conferred > 90% protective efficacy for a period of 6 months. Over the entire study period, only 22 out of 1400 released mosquitoes bit volunteers using the treated sacking strip while 894 out of 1400 mosquitoes released into cages containing volunteers using an untreated strip fed upon them. CONCLUSION: Locally available natural fibers may be promising absorbent substrates for delivering spatial repellents, such as transfluthrin, to protect against mosquitoes in tropical settings. However, these observations relate to a single prototype specimen of this particular device, therefore, much more detailed, well replicated studies are essential to establish long-term efficacy, effectiveness, practicability and affordability.
Authors: Dan W Meyrowitsch; Erling M Pedersen; Michael Alifrangis; Thomas H Scheike; Mwelecele N Malecela; Stephen M Magesa; Yahya A Derua; Rwehumbiza T Rwegoshora; Edwin Michael; Paul E Simonsen Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Jamie T Griffin; T Deirdre Hollingsworth; Lucy C Okell; Thomas S Churcher; Michael White; Wes Hinsley; Teun Bousema; Chris J Drakeley; Neil M Ferguson; María-Gloria Basáñez; Azra C Ghani Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Michael R Reddy; Hans J Overgaard; Simon Abaga; Vamsi P Reddy; Adalgisa Caccone; Anthony E Kiszewski; Michel A Slotman Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Hugo Bugoro; Robert D Cooper; Charles Butafa; Charles Iro'ofa; Donna O Mackenzie; Cheng-Chen Chen; Tanya L Russell Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Margaret Mendi Njoroge; Alexandra Hiscox; Adam Saddler; Willem Takken; Joop J A van Loon; Ulrike Fillinger Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2022-07-20 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Mgeni M Tambwe; Adam Saddler; Ummi Abdul Kibondo; Rajabu Mashauri; Katharina S Kreppel; Nicodem J Govella; Sarah J Moore Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Samson S Kiware; Nakul Chitnis; Sarah J Moore; Gregor J Devine; Silas Majambere; Stephen Merrill; Gerry F Killeen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David J Menger; Philemon Omusula; Maarten Holdinga; Tobias Homan; Ana S Carreira; Patrice Vandendaele; Jean-Luc Derycke; Collins K Mweresa; Wolfgang Richard Mukabana; Joop J A van Loon; Willem Takken Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joseph M Wagman; John P Grieco; Kim Bautista; Jorge Polanco; Ireneo Briceño; Russell King; Nicole L Achee Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Ferdinand V Salazar; Nicole L Achee; John P Grieco; Atchariya Prabaripai; Tolulope A Ojo; Lars Eisen; Christine Dureza; Suppaluck Polsomboon; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 3.876