Literature DB >> 22432947

Evaluation of the performance of a new compression system in patients with lymphoedema.

Peter J Franks1, Christine J Moffatt, Susie Murray, Martina Reddick, Andrea Tilley, Anne Schreiber.   

Abstract

In the acute phase of lymphoedema, patients require comprehensive decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes skin care, an exercise regimen, manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) and regular bandaging. This study was established to determine the effectiveness of a new system of bandage therapy, the 3M™ Coban™ 2 compression system. In total, 24 patients were entered into the study (12 from UK and 12 from Canada) with a variety of clinical presentations. The mean age of the groups was 57·4 years, which varied from 26 to 79 years. Body mass index (BMI) averaged 38·9 kg/m(2), with a range from 22·7 to 67·5 kg/m(2). Of the total, eight were women with arm lymphoedema, the remainder being men and women with lymphoedema of the lower limb. All were considered to be in need of CDT. After 19 days, the reduction of limb volume was measured, which indicated a mean limb volume reduction of 1210 ml (95% confidence interval, CI, 780-1641, P < 0·001). Leg affected patients experienced greater reduction than arm affected patients (1596 ml versus 438 ml), although both groups experienced significant reduction in limb volumes (both P < 0·001). Mean percentage changes in limb volume were 14·9% and 16·1% for legs and arms, respectively. The Measure Your Medical Outcome Profile questionnaire indicated significant improvement in symptoms considered important by the patient (P < 0·0001), which also led to improvements in skin quality by reducing skin thickness and firmness. The Coban 2 compression system provides good oedema reduction in both arms and legs to reduce limb volume and improvements in symptoms associated with lymphoedema.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22432947      PMCID: PMC7950755          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00958.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  10 in total

1.  A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial comparing multilayer bandaging followed by hosiery versus hosiery alone in the treatment of patients with lymphedema of the limb.

Authors:  C M Badger; J L Peacock; P S Mortimer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A preliminary randomized controlled study to determine the application frequency of a new lymphoedema bandaging system.

Authors:  C J Moffatt; P J Franks; D Hardy; M Lewis; V Parker; J L Feldman
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Effects of compression bandaging with or without manual lymph drainage treatment in patients with postoperative arm lymphedema.

Authors:  K Johansson; M Albertsson; C Ingvar; C Ekdahl
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.286

4.  Treatment of breast-cancer-related lymphedema with or without manual lymphatic drainage--a randomized study.

Authors:  L Andersen; I Højris; M Erlandsen; J Andersen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 5.  Physical therapies for reducing and controlling lymphoedema of the limbs.

Authors:  C Badger; N Preston; K Seers; P Mortimer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

6.  The addition of manual lymph drainage to compression therapy for breast cancer related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Margaret L McNeely; David J Magee; Alan W Lees; Keith M Bagnall; Mark Haykowsky; John Hanson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Psychosocial aspects of upper extremity lymphedema in women treated for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S D Passik; M V McDonald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Quality of life and peripheral lymphedema.

Authors:  J M Pereira de Godoy; D M Braile; M de Fátima Godoy; O Longo
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  The use of compression to treat lymphoedema.

Authors:  R Hornsby
Journal:  Prof Nurse       Date:  1995-11

10.  Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey.

Authors:  C Paterson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-20
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the effectiveness of complex decongestive therapy and compression bandaging as a method of treatment of lymphedema in the elderly.

Authors:  Ewa Zasadzka; Tomasz Trzmiel; Maria Kleczewska; Mariola Pawlaczyk
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Efficacy and efficiency of a new therapeutic approach based on activity-oriented proprioceptive antiedema therapy (TAPA) for edema reduction and improved occupational performance in the rehabilitation of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema in women: a controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz; Luis Ángel Pérula-de-Torres; Jesús Serrano-Merino; Antonio José Jiménez-Vílchez; María Victoria Olmo-Carmona; María Teresa Muñoz-García; Cruz Bartolomé-Moreno; Bárbara Oliván-Blázquez; Rosa Magallón-Botaya
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Ayşegül Yaman; Pınar Borman; Adeviye İnanlı; Fatma Kul; Sevilay Karahan
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.