Literature DB >> 22432678

Only the best: medical student selection in Australia.

Ian G Wilson1, Christopher Roberts, Eleanor M Flynn, Barbara Griffin.   

Abstract

Selection processes for medical schools need to be unbiased, valid, and psychometrically reliable, as well as evidence-based and transparent to all stakeholders. A range of academic and non-academic criteria are used for selection, including matriculation scores, aptitude tests and interviews. Research into selection is fraught with methodological difficulties; however, it shows positive benefits for structured selection processes. Pretest coaching and "faking good" are potential limitations of current selection procedures. Developments in medical school selection include the use of personality tests, centralised selection centres and programs to increase participation by socially disadvantaged students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22432678     DOI: 10.5694/mja10.11388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  11 in total

1.  Medical University admission test: a confirmatory factor analysis of the results.

Authors:  Marion Luschin-Ebengreuth; Hans P Dimai; Daniel Ithaler; Heide M Neges; Gilbert Reibnegger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  The influences of background on beginning medical students' perceptions of rural medical practice.

Authors:  Robin A Ray; Louise Young; Daniel B Lindsay
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Situational judgment test as an additional tool in a medical admission test: an observational investigation.

Authors:  Marion Luschin-Ebengreuth; Hans P Dimai; Daniel Ithaler; Heide M Neges; Gilbert Reibnegger
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-03-14

4.  Identifying the Dominant Personality Profiles in Medical Students: Implications for Their Well-Being and Resilience.

Authors:  Diann S Eley; Janni Leung; Barry A Hong; Kevin M Cloninger; C Robert Cloninger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  What do beginning students, in a rurally focused medical course, think about rural practice?

Authors:  Louise Young; Daniel B Lindsay; Robin A Ray
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Factors that influence the choice to work in rural township health centers among 4,669 clinical medical students from five medical universities in Guangxi, China.

Authors:  Yunbo Qing; Guijie Hu; Qingyun Chen; Hailun Peng; Kailan Li; Jinling Wei; Yanhua Yi
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2015-07-10

7.  Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools.

Authors:  Daniel Edwards; Tim Friedman; Jacob Pearce
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  The impact of preparatory activities on medical school selection outcomes: a cross-sectional survey of applicants to the University of Adelaide Medical School in 2007.

Authors:  Caroline O Laurence; Ian T Zajac; Michelle Lorimer; Deborah A Turnbull; Karen E Sumner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT).

Authors:  Ian B Puddey; Annette Mercer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Rural training pathways: the return rate of doctors to work in the same region as their basic medical training.

Authors:  Matthew R McGrail; Belinda G O'Sullivan; Deborah J Russell
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2018-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.