Literature DB >> 2243259

Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

L E Kazis1, L F Callahan, R F Meenan, T Pincus.   

Abstract

We examined the use of formal health status reports every 3 months over 1 year in the clinical care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The reports consisted of single-page, computer-generated summaries of scores derived from either the AIMS (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales) or the MHAQ (Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire) health status questionnaires. A total of 1920 subjects from 27 community practice sites were randomly assigned to three study groups in each practice: intervention, attention placebo and control. Results showed that 55% of the physicians found the reports to be at least moderately useful as an aid to patient management, primarily for improving the doctor-patient relationship. However, no detectable differences among the three groups were seen in terms of medication compliance, number of physician visits, number of referrals, frequency of major medication changes, attitudes towards the physician, patient satisfaction or change in health status over 1 year. The failure to demonstrate objective benefits of health status reports in this study may be due to physician unfamiliarity with health status scores, failure to link the report with an office visit, the relative stability of clinical status in the subjects over 1 year and the relatively short time-frame of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2243259     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90025-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  33 in total

1.  Quality of life as an instrument for need assessment and outcome assessment of health care in chronic patients.

Authors:  G A van den Bos; A H Triemstra
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

2.  Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting.

Authors:  I J Higginson; A J Carr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

Review 3.  Improving the detection and management of depression in primary care.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; P M Whitty; J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

4.  A pragmatic defence of health status measures.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-11

Review 5.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

6.  How good is "very good"? Translation effect in the racial/ethnic variation in self-rated health status.

Authors:  Sukyong Seo; Sukyung Chung; Martha Shumway
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Quality of life assessment by community pharmacists: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J P Bentley; M C Smith; B F Banahan; D A Frate; B R Parks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  On the generalizability of statistical expressions of health related quality of life instrument responsiveness: a data synthesis.

Authors:  M M Murawski; P A Miederhoff
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Effects of total hip replacement on quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Borstlap; J L Zant; M Van Soesbergen; J K Van der Korst
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 10.  Outcome measures and needs assessment tools for schizophrenia and related disorders.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.