Literature DB >> 22432502

Forecasting the effect of the Amethyst initiative on college drinking.

Ben G Fitzpatrick1, Richard Scribner, Azmy S Ackleh, Jawaid Rasul, Geoffrey Jacquez, Neal Simonsen, Robert Rommel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of college presidents have endorsed the Amethyst Initiative, a call to consider lowering the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA). Our objective is to forecast the effect of the Amethyst Initiative on college drinking.
METHODS: A system model of college drinking simulates MLDA changes through (i) a decrease in heavy episodic drinking (HED) because of the lower likelihood of students drinking in unsupervised settings where they model irresponsible drinking (misperception), and (ii) an increase in overall drinking among currently underage students because of increased social availability of alcohol (wetness).
RESULTS: For the proportion of HEDs on campus, effects of large decreases in misperception of responsible drinking behavior were more than offset by modest increases in wetness.
CONCLUSIONS: For the effect of lowering the MLDA, it appears that increases in social availability of alcohol have a stronger impact on drinking behavior than decreases in misperceptions.
Copyright © 2012 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22432502      PMCID: PMC4226518          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01765.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  30 in total

1.  Misperceptions of the norms for the frequency of alcohol and other drug use on college campuses.

Authors:  H W Perkins; P W Meilman; J S Leichliter; J R Cashin; C A Presley
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  Managing alcohol problems and risky drinking.

Authors:  T F Babor; M Aguirre-Molina; G A Marlatt; R Clayton
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

3.  Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse.

Authors:  H Wesley Perkins; Michael P Haines; Richard Rice
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-07

4.  Social networks and college drinking: probing processes of social influence and selection.

Authors:  Alan Reifman; Wendy K Watson; Andrea McCourt
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-06

5.  Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.

Authors:  J S Baer; A Stacy; M Larimer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1991-11

6.  The drinking age. The status quo has bombed.

Authors:  John McCardell
Journal:  US News World Rep       Date:  2008 Sep 15-22

7.  Changing the perception of the norm: a strategy to decrease binge drinking among college students.

Authors:  M Haines; S F Spear
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  1996-11

8.  The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument.

Authors:  D Mayfield; G McLeod; P Hall
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Minimum purchasing age for alcohol and traffic crash injuries among 15- to 19-year-olds in New Zealand.

Authors:  Kypros Kypri; Robert B Voas; John D Langley; Shaun C R Stephenson; Dorothy J Begg; A Scott Tippetts; Gabrielle S Davie
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Michael P Carey; Kelly S DeMartini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  5 in total

1.  Endorsement of a Personal Responsibility to Adhere to the Minimum Drinking Age Law Predicts Consumption, Risky Behaviors, and Alcohol-Related Harms.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Katherine Croom; Lisa Staiano-Coico; Martin L Lesser; Deborah Lewis; Jeremy Frank; Timothy Marchell
Journal:  Psychol Public Policy Law       Date:  2013-08-01

2.  The Big Impact of Small Groups on College Drinking.

Authors:  B Fitzpatrick; J Martinez; E Polidan; E Angelis
Journal:  J Artif Soc Soc Simul       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  A comparison of the responsible drinking dimensions among underage and legal drinkers: examining differences in beliefs, motives, self-efficacy, barriers and intentions.

Authors:  Adam E Barry; Michael L Stellefson; Conrad L Woolsey
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2014-01-22

4.  Optimization and Control of Agent-Based Models in Biology: A Perspective.

Authors:  G An; B G Fitzpatrick; S Christley; P Federico; A Kanarek; R Miller Neilan; M Oremland; R Salinas; R Laubenbacher; S Lenhart
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Effects of minimum legal drinking age on alcohol and marijuana use: evidence from toxicological testing data for fatally injured drivers aged 16 to 25 years.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Joanne E Brady; Guohua Li
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.