Literature DB >> 22431426

Denosumab reduces the risk of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women, particularly in those with moderate to high fracture risk as assessed with FRAX.

Eugene V McCloskey1, Helena Johansson, Anders Oden, Matt Austin, Ethel Siris, Andrea Wang, E Michael Lewiecki, Roman Lorenc, Cesar Libanati, John A Kanis.   

Abstract

Denosumab has been shown to reduce the incidence of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the antifracture efficacy of denosumab was dependent on baseline fracture probability assessed by FRAX. The primary data of the phase 3 FREEDOM study of the effects of denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were used to compute country-specific probabilities using the FRAX tool (version 3.2). The outcome variable comprised all clinical osteoporotic fractures (including clinical vertebral fractures). Interactions between fracture probability and efficacy were explored by Poisson regression. At baseline, the median 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture (with bone mineral density) was approximately 15% and for hip fracture was approximately 5% in both groups. In the simplest model adjusted for age and fracture probability, treatment with denosumab over 3 years was associated with a 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20% to 42%) decrease in clinical osteoporotic fractures. Denosumab reduced fracture risk to a greater extent in those at moderate to high risk. For example, at 10% probability, denosumab decreased fracture risk by 11% (p = 0.629), whereas at 30% probability (90th percentile of study population) the reduction was 50% (p = 0.001). The reduction in fracture was independent of prior fracture, parental history of hip fracture, or secondary causes of osteoporosis. A low body mass index (BMI) was associated with greater efficacy. Denosumab significantly decreased the risk of clinical osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Overall, the efficacy of denosumab was greater in those at moderate to high risk of fracture as assessed by FRAX.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22431426     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  53 in total

1.  [Omission of osteoporosis diagnostics and therapy after fractures in the elderly : an avoidable treatment error?].

Authors:  C Neuerburg; K Heberer; J Heberer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Osteoporosis drugs most effective in women at high fracture risk.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2012-06-13

3.  One-leg standing time and hip-fracture prediction.

Authors:  H Lundin; M Sääf; L-E Strender; S Nyren; S-E Johansson; H Salminen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The distribution of FRAX(®)-based probabilities in women from Japan.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene and raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Europe, using the FRAX algorithm.

Authors:  K Kim; A Svedbom; X Luo; S Sutradhar; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds in seven Latin American countries.

Authors:  P Clark; E Denova-Gutiérrez; C Zerbini; A Sanchez; O Messina; J J Jaller; C Campusano; C H Orces; G Riera; H Johansson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Underestimated fracture risk in postmenopausal women-application of the hybrid intervention threshold.

Authors:  Y Wang; S Yu; C Hsu; C Tsai; T Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Intervention thresholds for denosumab in the UK using a FRAX®-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  O Ström; B Jönsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Failure in the application of fragility fracture prevention guidelines.

Authors:  M H Elvey; H Pugh; G Schaller; G Dhotar; B Patel; M J Oddy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.