BACKGROUND: cognitive test scores and visual acuity are strongly associated in older people. This may be due to poor vision limiting performance on cognitive tasks specifically requiring vision, or an association between visual and neurodegenerative disorders. OBJECTIVE: to explore, using data from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study, the impact of sight impairment (SI) on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and whether reduced scores among SI participants are limited to tasks requiring vision. RESULTS: of 839 participants aged 85 years, 44 (5.2%) were registered SI. Median (inter-quartile range) sMMSE scores were 25 (22-29) for SI and 28 (25-29) for non-SI participants (P=0.006). SI participants had lower subscale scores on tasks requiring vision (P<0.001 for each) but also for some subscale scores not obviously requiring vision: orientation (P=0.018) and repetition (P=0.030). Excluding visual items, there was no significant difference in MMSE scores between those with/without SI. CONCLUSION: SI may be an obstacle to older people completing cognitive assessments including tasks requiring vision. People with SI also scored lower on some tasks not obviously requiring vision. An association between cognitive impairment and SI may exist beyond simply being unable to see the test material in cognitive tests.
BACKGROUND: cognitive test scores and visual acuity are strongly associated in older people. This may be due to poor vision limiting performance on cognitive tasks specifically requiring vision, or an association between visual and neurodegenerative disorders. OBJECTIVE: to explore, using data from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study, the impact of sight impairment (SI) on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and whether reduced scores among SI participants are limited to tasks requiring vision. RESULTS: of 839 participants aged 85 years, 44 (5.2%) were registered SI. Median (inter-quartile range) sMMSE scores were 25 (22-29) for SI and 28 (25-29) for non-SI participants (P=0.006). SI participants had lower subscale scores on tasks requiring vision (P<0.001 for each) but also for some subscale scores not obviously requiring vision: orientation (P=0.018) and repetition (P=0.030). Excluding visual items, there was no significant difference in MMSE scores between those with/without SI. CONCLUSION: SI may be an obstacle to older people completing cognitive assessments including tasks requiring vision. People with SI also scored lower on some tasks not obviously requiring vision. An association between cognitive impairment and SI may exist beyond simply being unable to see the test material in cognitive tests.
Authors: Joanna Collerton; Karen Davies; Carol Jagger; Andrew Kingston; John Bond; Martin P Eccles; Louise A Robinson; Carmen Martin-Ruiz; Thomas von Zglinicki; Oliver F W James; Thomas B L Kirkwood Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-12-22
Authors: J R Evans; A E Fletcher; R P L Wormald; E Siu-Woon Ng; S Stirling; L Smeeth; E Breeze; C J Bulpitt; M Nunes; D Jones; A Tulloch Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Joanna Collerton; Karen Barrass; John Bond; Martin Eccles; Carol Jagger; Oliver James; Carmen Martin-Ruiz; Louise Robinson; Thomas von Zglinicki; Tom Kirkwood Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2007-06-26 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Saurav Das; Adam S Fleisher; Roy Yaari; James D Seward; Anna D Burke; Helle Brand; Pierre N Tariot Journal: Prim Care Companion CNS Disord Date: 2014-02-27
Authors: Joanna M Jefferis; John-Paul Taylor; Joanna Collerton; Carol Jagger; Andrew Kingston; Karen Davies; Tom Kirkwood; Michael P Clarke Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.648
Authors: Sarah T Pendlebury; Stephen P Klaus; Ross J Thomson; Ziyah Mehta; Rose M Wharton; Peter M Rothwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Elaine M Tran; Marcia L Stefanick; Victor W Henderson; Stephen R Rapp; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Nicole M Armstrong; Mark A Espeland; Emily W Gower; Aladdin H Shadyab; Wenjun Li; Katie L Stone; Suzann Pershing Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Noe Garin; Beatriz Olaya; Elvira Lara; Maria Victoria Moneta; Marta Miret; Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos; Josep Maria Haro Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 3.295