Literature DB >> 22430887

Utility of fecal and serum anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease-like condition of the pouch.

Linda Y Tang1, Hui Cai, Udayakumar Navaneethan, James H Boone, Sarah J Rhodes, Lauren Moore, Hyunjin Rho, Carol de La Motte, Elaine Queener, Bo Shen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fecal antibodies against bacterial products may directly reflect the interaction between luminal bacteria and mucosal immunity, and assays for these antibodies may be clinically useful in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Crohn's disease-like (CDL) condition of the pouch. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate stool and serum anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) in normal and diseased pouches, to assess the correlation between ASCA levels and endoscopic disease activity, and to ascertain the diagnostic utility of ASCA for CDL of the pouch.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine patients with ileal pouches were prospectively enrolled and corresponding serum and pouch aspirate samples were collected. Fecal and serum ASCA levels were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a blinded fashion. Statistical analysis was then conducted using the signed rank test, Spearman correlation coefficients, and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients (22.8 %) had irritable pouch syndrome or normal pouches, 74 (39.2 %) had pouchitis/cuffitis, 52 (27.5 %) had CDL, 9 (4.8 %) had familial adenomatous polyposis, and 11 (5.8 %) had surgical complications of the pouch. Receiver operating characteristic curves to distinguish CDL from other categories of pouch dysfunction had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.608 for fecal ASCA and an AUC of 0.517 for serum ASCA. Neither fecal nor serum ASCA correlated with endoscopic disease activity scores. There was a significant difference in the mean values of fecal ASCA between inflammatory and fistulizing CDL (0.27 vs. 0.03 ELISA units/ml, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Fecal ASCA appears to be better than serum ASCA in differentiating CDL from other pouch disorders, although this distinction may be of limited clinical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22430887     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1444-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  33 in total

1.  Utility of serum antibodies in determining clinical course in pediatric Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Barbara Desir; Devendra K Amre; Shou-En Lu; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Marla Dubinsky; Rachel Fisher; Ernest G Seidman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 2.  Crohn's disease of the ileal pouch: reality, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Bo Shen
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.325

3.  Endoscopic and histologic evaluation together with symptom assessment are required to diagnose pouchitis.

Authors:  B Shen; J P Achkar; B A Lashner; A H Ormsby; F H Remzi; C L Bevins; A Brzezinski; R E Petras; V W Fazio
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: comparison of different assays and correlation with clinical features.

Authors:  V Annese; A Piepoli; F Perri; G Lombardi; A Latiano; G Napolitano; G Corritore; P Vandewalle; D Poulain; J F Colombel; A Andriulli
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Specific antibody response to oligomannosidic epitopes in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  B Sendid; J F Colombel; P M Jacquinot; C Faille; J Fruit; A Cortot; D Lucidarme; D Camus; D Poulain
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1996-03

6.  Clinical utility of serodiagnostic testing in suspected pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  M C Dubinsky; J J Ofman; M Urman; S R Targan; E G Seidman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Clinical features and quality of life in patients with different phenotypes of Crohn's disease of the ileal pouch.

Authors:  Bo Shen; Victor W Fazio; Feza H Remzi; Ana E Bennett; Ian C Lavery; Rocio Lopez; Aaron Brezinski; Kerry K Sherman; Marlene L Bambrick; Bret A Lashner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Long-term outcomes with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and Crohn's disease: pouch retention and implications of delayed diagnosis.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Victor W Fazio; Ravi P Kiran; Jin He; Ian C Lavery; Bo Shen; Jean-Paul Achkar; James M Church; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys?

Authors:  S Vermeire; G Van Assche; P Rutgeerts
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Family history and serology predict Crohn's disease after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Gil Y Melmed; Phillip R Fleshner; Ovunc Bardakcioglu; Andrew Ippoliti; Eric A Vasiliauskas; Konstantinos A Papadakis; Marla Dubinsky; Carol Landers; Jerome I Rotter; Stephan R Targan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Review article: the pathogenesis of pouchitis.

Authors:  K M Schieffer; E D Williams; G S Yochum; W A Koltun
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 2.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Microbial Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Authors:  Marla Dubinsky; Jonathan Braun
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Targeting tissular immune response improves diagnostic performance of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Daniel Bertin; Jean-Charles Grimaud; Nathalie Lesavre; Chahine Benelmouloud; Ariadne Desjeux; Stéphane Garcia; Sophie Desplat-Jégo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.