Literature DB >> 22430845

Genotypic differences and prior defoliation affect re-growth and phytochemistry after coppicing in Populus tremuloides.

Michael T Stevens1, Adam C Gusse, Richard L Lindroth.   

Abstract

Although considerable research has explored how tree growth and defense can be influenced by genotype, the biotic environment, and their interaction, little is known about how genotypic differences, prior defoliation, and their interactive effects persist in trees that re-grow after damage that severs their primary stem. To address these issues, we established a common garden consisting of twelve genotypes of potted aspen (Populus tremuloides) trees, and subjected half of the trees to defoliation in two successive years. At the beginning of the third year, all trees were severed at the soil surface (coppiced) and allowed to regenerate for five months. Afterwards, we counted the number of root and stump sprouts produced and measured the basal diameter (d) and height (h) of the tallest ramet in each pot. We collected leaves one and two years after the second defoliation and assessed levels of phenolic glycosides, condensed tannins, and nitrogen. In terms of re-growth, we found that the total number of sprouts produced varied by 3.6-fold among genotypes, and that prior defoliation decreased total sprout production by 24%. The size (d(2)h) of ramets, however, did not differ significantly among genotypes or defoliation classes. In terms of phytochemistry, we observed genotypic differences in concentrations of all phytochemicals assessed both one and two years after the second defoliation. Two years after defoliation, we observed effects of prior defoliation in a genotype-by-defoliation interaction for condensed tannins. Results from this study demonstrate that genotypic differences and impacts of prior defoliation persist to influence growth and defense traits in trees even after complete removal of above-ground stems, and thus likely influence productivity and plant-herbivore interactions in forests affected by natural disturbances or actively managed through coppicing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22430845     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-012-0081-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  21 in total

1.  Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.

Authors:  Tod L Osier; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kasey E Barton; Julia Koricheva
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Induced resistance in the indeterminate growth of aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Authors:  Michael T Stevens; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Reiterative and interruptive signaling in induced plant resistance to chewing insects.

Authors:  Jinwon Kim; Hélène Quaghebeur; Gary W Felton
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 5.  Phenolic glycosides of the Salicaceae and their role as anti-herbivore defenses.

Authors:  G Andreas Boeckler; Jonathan Gershenzon; Sybille B Unsicker
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  Effects of genotype, nutrient availability, and defoliation on aspen phytochemistry and insect performance.

Authors:  T L Osier; R L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars.

Authors:  S-Y Hwang; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Behavioral archives link the chemistry and clonal structure of trembling aspen to the food choice of North American porcupine.

Authors:  Brandee Diner; Dominique Berteaux; Jim Fyles; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Genotype and environment determine allocation to and costs of resistance in quaking aspen.

Authors:  Tod L Osier; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Preservation of salicaceae leaves for phytochemical analyses: Further assessment.

Authors:  R L Lindroth; P A Koss
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  4 in total

1.  Root chemistry in Populus tremuloides: effects of soil nutrients, defoliation, and genotype.

Authors:  Michael T Stevens; Adam C Gusse; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Influence of Genotype, Environment, and Gypsy Moth Herbivory on Local and Systemic Chemical Defenses in Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Authors:  Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; John J Couture; Ian T Major; C Peter Constabel; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Leaf herbivory by insects during summer reduces overwinter browsing by moose.

Authors:  Brian P Allman; Knut Kielland; Diane Wagner
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.964

4.  Genetic Modification of Lignin in Hybrid Poplar (Populus alba × Populus tremula) Does Not Substantially Alter Plant Defense or Arthropod Communities.

Authors:  Christine Buhl; Richard Meilan; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.