AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of teeth reattached with sixth generation dentin bonding agent: Xeno III and microhybrid resin composite: Esthet-X, using three different techniques: (1) Simple reattachment, (2) overcontour and (3) internal dentinal groove. METHODOLOGY: A total of 70 human maxillary central incisors were selected and divided into four groups as follows. Group I: Control group comprised of 10 samples. Group II: Simple reattachment, group III: Overcontour and group IV: Internal dentinal groove. Groups II, III and IV comprised of 20 samples each. The teeth in three study groups were sectioned using a diamond disk and the fragment was reattached with Esthet-X and Xeno III using three different techniques. Specimens were stored in tap water for 24 hours and shear bond strength was determined using universal testing machine using a knife edge chisel (0.5 mm in cross-section) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. RESULTS: The results of this study showed following mean value of fracture strength in Kgf: Group I: Control-27.71; group II: Simple reattachment-9.78; group III: Overcontour-24.41; group IV: Internal dentinal groove-23.83. CONCLUSION: The overcontour technique had the highest strength recovery while the simple reattachment had the lowest. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The overcontour technique provided strength recovery almost similar to intact teeth emphasizing that tooth preparation influenced fracture resistance.
AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of teeth reattached with sixth generation dentin bonding agent: Xeno III and microhybrid resin composite: Esthet-X, using three different techniques: (1) Simple reattachment, (2) overcontour and (3) internal dentinal groove. METHODOLOGY: A total of 70 human maxillary central incisors were selected and divided into four groups as follows. Group I: Control group comprised of 10 samples. Group II: Simple reattachment, group III: Overcontour and group IV: Internal dentinal groove. Groups II, III and IV comprised of 20 samples each. The teeth in three study groups were sectioned using a diamond disk and the fragment was reattached with Esthet-X and Xeno III using three different techniques. Specimens were stored in tap water for 24 hours and shear bond strength was determined using universal testing machine using a knife edge chisel (0.5 mm in cross-section) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. RESULTS: The results of this study showed following mean value of fracture strength in Kgf: Group I: Control-27.71; group II: Simple reattachment-9.78; group III: Overcontour-24.41; group IV: Internal dentinal groove-23.83. CONCLUSION: The overcontour technique had the highest strength recovery while the simple reattachment had the lowest. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The overcontour technique provided strength recovery almost similar to intact teeth emphasizing that tooth preparation influenced fracture resistance.