Literature DB >> 22430563

Shaken or swirled? Mixing gadolinium for arthrography.

Andrew D Scott1, David Leswick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To better understand how variability in preparation of gadolinium solutions may affect image quality for MRI arthrography studies.
METHODS: Two different mixing techniques were employed in preparation of gadolinium/saline dilutions (repeated inversion vs. swirling). Test syringes were then placed together with unmixed and control syringes in a specially prepared holder in the MRI machine and both initial and delayed T1FS sequences were performed. Qualitative assessment was performed to evaluate completeness of contrast mixing and overall signal intensity of contrast within the syringe. Quantitative measurements were performed using a circular region of interest centered on the lumen of each syringe. Three trials were performed.
RESULTS: Subjective and quantitative analysis revealed that the repeatedly inverted syringe demonstrated more uniform high signal with lower standard deviation than the swirled syringe in all three trials. Subjective evaluation of the swirled syringe revealed contrast/saline levels on both initial and delayed scans. The syringe that was not mixed after addition of gadolinium demonstrated even more obvious dependant layering of contrast than did the swirled syringe on both initial and delayed scans.
CONCLUSIONS: When preparing small volumes of diluted gadolinium solution for intraarticular injection, the technique of mixing may influence the composition of the injected solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22430563     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1393-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

Review 1.  Direct MR arthrography: a review of current use.

Authors:  A J Grainger; J M Elliott; R S Campbell; P F Tirman; L S Steinbach; H K Genant
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: two concentrations of gadoteridol versus Ringer solution as the intraarticular contrast material.

Authors:  C A Binkert; M Zanetti; C Gerber; J Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Special focus session. MR arthrography.

Authors:  Lynne S Steinbach; William E Palmer; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: a review of potential sources of diagnostic errors.

Authors:  K W Carroll; C A Helms
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  MR arthrography of the shoulder.

Authors:  Christine B Chung; Lisa Corrente; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 6.  MR imaging of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Ara Kassarjian; Jenny T Bencardino; William E Palmer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 7.  Shoulder MR arthrography: how, why, when.

Authors:  Marlena Jbara; Qi Chen; Paul Marten; Morcos Morcos; Javier Beltran
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  An overview of MR arthrography with emphasis on the current technique and applicational hints and tips.

Authors:  Gülden Sahin; Mehmet Demirtaş
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance arthrography.

Authors:  Usha Chundru; Geoffrey M Riley; Lynne S Steinbach
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Direct MR arthrography of the shoulder at 3 Tesla: optimization of gadolinium concentration.

Authors:  Yao Shang; Zhuo-zhao Zheng; Xuan Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.