Literature DB >> 22430001

A scoring system for the foot and ankle that is acceptable, reliable, valid and responsive.

Jill Dawson, Irene Boller, Helen Doll, Crispin Jenkinson, Grahame Lavis, Robert Sharp, Paul Cooke.   

Abstract

We read with interest the recent paper by Groarke et al. (Quality of life in individuals with chronic foot conditions: a cross sectional observational study. The Foot (2012) doi:10.1016/i.foot.2011.11.007). The paper ended by stating that 'there is no scoring system for the foot and ankle that is valid, repeatable and reliable'. This statement is misleading. The authors could have made reference to the patient-reported Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). The MOXFQ has been subjected to more rigorous testing of its measurement properties than is the case for most instruments, and has been demonstrated to be acceptable, reliable, valid and responsive in the context of foot or ankle surgery.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22430001     DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2012.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot (Edinb)        ISSN: 0958-2592


  1 in total

1.  Total ankle replacement versus arthrodesis (TARVA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Goldberg; Razi Zaidi; Claire Thomson; Caroline J Doré; Simon S Skene; Suzie Cro; Jeff Round; Andrew Molloy; Mark Davies; Michael Karski; Louise Kim; Paul Cooke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.