BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether early allied health intervention by a dedicated Emergency Department (ED) based team, occurring before or in parallel with medical assessment, reduces hospital admission rates amongst older patients presenting with one of ten index problems. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized trial in patients aged sixty five and over, conducted in two Australian hospital EDs. Intervention group patients, receiving early comprehensive allied health input, were compared to patients that received no allied health assessment. Propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups due to the non-randomized nature of the study. The primary outcome was admission to an inpatient hospital bed from the ED. RESULTS:Of five thousand two hundred and sixty five patients in the trial, 3165 were in the intervention group. The admission rate in the intervention group was 72.0% compared to 74.4% in the control group. Using propensity score probabilities of being assigned to either group in a conditional logistic regression model, this difference was of borderline statistical significance (p = 0.046, OR 0.88 (0.76-1.00)). On subgroup analysis the admission rate in patients with musculoskeletal symptoms and angina pectoris was less for those who received allied health intervention versus those who did not. This difference was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Early allied health intervention in the ED has a significant but modest impact on admission rates in older patients. The effect appears to be limited to a small number of common presenting problems.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether early allied health intervention by a dedicated Emergency Department (ED) based team, occurring before or in parallel with medical assessment, reduces hospital admission rates amongst older patients presenting with one of ten index problems. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized trial in patients aged sixty five and over, conducted in two Australian hospital EDs. Intervention group patients, receiving early comprehensive allied health input, were compared to patients that received no allied health assessment. Propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups due to the non-randomized nature of the study. The primary outcome was admission to an inpatient hospital bed from the ED. RESULTS: Of five thousand two hundred and sixty five patients in the trial, 3165 were in the intervention group. The admission rate in the intervention group was 72.0% compared to 74.4% in the control group. Using propensity score probabilities of being assigned to either group in a conditional logistic regression model, this difference was of borderline statistical significance (p = 0.046, OR 0.88 (0.76-1.00)). On subgroup analysis the admission rate in patients with musculoskeletal symptoms and angina pectoris was less for those who received allied health intervention versus those who did not. This difference was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Early allied health intervention in the ED has a significant but modest impact on admission rates in older patients. The effect appears to be limited to a small number of common presenting problems.
Authors: Lorraine C Mion; Robert M Palmer; Stephen W Meldon; David M Bass; Mendel E Singer; Susan M C Payne; Linda J Lewicki; Barbara L Drew; Jason T Connor; James W Campbell; Charles Emerman Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kenneth E Covinsky; Robert M Palmer; Richard H Fortinsky; Steven R Counsell; Anita L Stewart; Denise Kresevic; Christopher J Burant; C Seth Landefeld Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Glenn Arendts; Christopher Etherton-Beer; Roslyn Jones; Kate Bullow; Ellen MacDonald; Sandra Dumas; Daniel Parker; Marani Hutton; Sally Burrows; Simon G A Brown; Osvaldo P Almeida Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Lisa M McElroy; Kathryn A Schmidt; Christopher T Richards; Brittany Lapin; Michael M Abecassis; Jane L Holl; James Adams; Daniela P Ladner Journal: Transplantation Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Alexander X Lo; Kevin Biese; Glenn Arendts; Jay Banerjee; Ula Hwang; Scott Dresden; Vivian Argento; Maura Kennedy; Christina L Shenvi; Christopher R Carpenter Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jaime M Hughes; Caroline E Freiermuth; Megan Shepherd-Banigan; Luna Ragsdale; Stephanie A Eucker; Karen Goldstein; S Nicole Hastings; Rachel L Rodriguez; Jessica Fulton; Katherine Ramos; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Adelaide M Gordon; Jennifer M Gierisch; Andrzej Kosinski; John W Williams Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mieke Deschodt; Els Devriendt; Marc Sabbe; Daniel Knockaert; Peter Deboutte; Steven Boonen; Johan Flamaing; Koen Milisen Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Sarah H Credé; Colin O'Keeffe; Suzanne Mason; Anthea Sutton; Emma Howe; Susan J Croft; Mike Whiteside Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 2.655