| Literature DB >> 22429336 |
Gary Chinga-Carrasco1, Kristin Syverud.
Abstract
Cellulose nanofibrils have been proposed for novel barrier concepts, based on their capability to form smooth, strong and transparent films, with high oxygen barrier properties. A series of cellulose-based films were manufactured and tested with respect to their oxygen transmission rate (OTR) capabilities. The obtained OTR levels were considerably better than the levels recommended for packaging applications. Part of the nanofibrillated material applied in this study was produced with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-oxyl (TEMPO) mediated oxidation as pretreatment. Films made of TEMPO-pretreated samples yielded lower OTR values. The minimum obtained OTR value was 3.0 mL m-2 day-1 atm-1 with a corresponding oxygen permeability of 0.04 mL mm m-2 day-1 atm-1, tested at 50% relative humidity. The good barrier properties are due to the compact and dense structure of the films, as revealed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy. A relationship between OTR and the structure of the corresponding nanofibril-based films was confirmed.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22429336 PMCID: PMC3324384 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Films were made from each series of the fibrillated materials
| Series | Fibre | Pretreatment | Homogenization (# passes) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F01 | - | 3 | |
| F02 | - | 3 | |
| F03 | TEMPO | 3 | |
| F04 | TEMPO | 3 | |
| F05 | - | 5 | |
| F06 | - | 5 | |
| F07 | TEMPO | 5 | |
| F08 | TEMPO | 5 | |
'# passes' indicates the number of passes the cellulose material passed through the homogenizer. Generally, the more passes through the homogenizer the more fibrillated the material is
Figure 1Structure of nanofibril-based films. (A) and (B) correspond to the surface structures of films F02 and F08, visualized in field emission SEM. (C) and (D) correspond to the cross-sectional structures (F01 and F04) visualized in SEM-BEI mode. The images have been enhanced for visualization purposes. The small dark cracks observed in images (C) and (D) are most probably due to the preparation for SEM analysis. (E) and (F) correspond to the cross-sectional structures after being subjected to water. The white arrows indicate the z-direction of the films and the boundaries of the upper and lower sides. The insets in (E) and (F) indicate some lamellar structures exemplifying the delamination of the films.
Figure 2SEM structural analysis. (A) SEM thickness. (B) SEM roughness. The average values are given with the corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3Surface quantification. (A) Surface roughness as measured with LP. (B) Surface roughness as measured with AFM. The average values are given with the corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Figure 4OTR as a function of density for films with a grammage of 20 g/m. OTR was measured at 50% relative humidity. The measurements corresponding to the TEMPO-pretreated samples have been encircled.