Literature DB >> 22429266

On the evolution of morphogenetic models: mechano-chemical interactions and an integrated view of cell differentiation, growth, pattern formation and morphogenesis.

Séverine Urdy1.   

Abstract

In the 1950s, embryology was conceptualized as four relatively independent problems: cell differentiation, growth, pattern formation and morphogenesis. The mechanisms underlying the first three traditionally have been viewed as being chemical in nature, whereas those underlying morphogenesis have usually been discussed in terms of mechanics. Often, morphogenesis and its mechanical processes have been regarded as subordinate to chemical ones. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that the biomechanics of cells and tissues affect in striking ways those phenomena often thought of as mainly under the control of cell-cell signalling. This accumulation of data has led to a revival of the mechano-transduction concept in particular, and of complexity in general, causing us now to consider whether we should retain the traditional conceptualization of development. The researchers' semantic preferences for the terms 'patterning', 'pattern formation' or 'morphogenesis' can be used to describe three main 'schools of thought' which emerged in the late 1970s. In the 'molecular school', the term patterning is deeply tied to the positional information concept. In the 'chemical school', the term 'pattern formation' regularly implies reaction-diffusion models. In the 'mechanical school', the term 'morphogenesis' is more frequently used in relation to mechanical instabilities. Major differences among these three schools pertain to the concept of self-organization, and models can be classified as morphostatic or morphodynamic. Various examples illustrate the distorted picture that arises from the distinction among differentiation, growth, pattern formation and morphogenesis, based on the idea that the underlying mechanisms are respectively chemical or mechanical. Emerging quantitative approaches integrate the concepts and methods of complex sciences and emphasize the interplay between hierarchical levels of organization via mechano-chemical interactions. They draw upon recent improvements in mathematical and numerical morphogenetic models and upon considerable progress in collecting new quantitative data. This review highlights a variety of such models, which exhibit important advances, such as hybrid, stochastic and multiscale simulations.
© 2012 The Author. Biological Reviews © 2012 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429266     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00221.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  9 in total

Review 1.  Computational models for mechanics of morphogenesis.

Authors:  Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Zi Chen; Benjamen A Filas; Victor D Varner; Larry A Taber
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2012-06

2.  Mechanical Models of Pattern and Form in Biological Tissues: The Role of Stress-Strain Constitutive Equations.

Authors:  Chiara Villa; Mark A J Chaplain; Alf Gerisch; Tommaso Lorenzi
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Mechanochemical symmetry breaking in Hydra aggregates.

Authors:  Moritz Mercker; Alexandra Köthe; Anna Marciniak-Czochra
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Curvature-driven spatial patterns in growing 3D domains: A mechanochemical model for phyllotaxis.

Authors:  Mara D Rueda-Contreras; José R Romero-Arias; José L Aragón; Rafael A Barrio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mechano-chemical aspects of organ formation in Arabidopsis thaliana: the relationship between auxin and pectin.

Authors:  Siobhan A Braybrook; Alexis Peaucelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Beyond Turing: mechanochemical pattern formation in biological tissues.

Authors:  Moritz Mercker; Felix Brinkmann; Anna Marciniak-Czochra; Thomas Richter
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Spheroid Formation of Hepatocarcinoma Cells in Microwells: Experiments and Monte Carlo Simulations.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Myung Hee Kim; Seyed R Tabaei; Jae Hyeok Park; Kyuhwan Na; Seok Chung; Vladimir P Zhdanov; Nam-Joon Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Post-Turing tissue pattern formation: Advent of mechanochemistry.

Authors:  Felix Brinkmann; Moritz Mercker; Thomas Richter; Anna Marciniak-Czochra
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Pattern regulation in a regenerating jellyfish.

Authors:  Chiara Sinigaglia; Sophie Peron; Jeanne Eichelbrenner; Sandra Chevalier; Julia Steger; Carine Barreau; Evelyn Houliston; Lucas Leclère
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.