INTRODUCTION: Adjunctive complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation or ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation have been proposed as new strategies to increase the elimination of AF, but the difference between CFAE/GP ablation and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), as well as the combined effect of CFAE/GP plus PVI ablation were unclear. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether adjunctive cardiac autonomic denervation (CAD) was effective for the elimination of AF, and whether CAD alone was superior to PVI in AF patients. METHODS: A systemic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCRT) was performed and controlled trials comparing the effect of PVI plus CFAE/GP ablation with PVI, as well as CFAE/GP ablation with PVI were collected. RESULTS: A total of 15 trials including 1,147 patients with AF were qualified for this meta-analysis. CAD plus PVI significantly increased the freedom from AF/ATs (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.33-2.59, P = 0.29). Subgroup analysis showed that additional CAD increased the ratio of sinus rhythm maintenance in both paroxysmal AF (OR 1.69; 95% CI: 1.09-2.62, P = 0.41) and nonparoxysmal AF (OR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.14-3.90, P = 0.14). Besides, when compared respectively, adjunctive CAD was not superior to PVI (OR 0.31; 95% CI: 0.11-0.86, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that CAD plus PVI significantly increase the freedom from recurrence of AF both in paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal patients. However, when compared alone, the benefit of CAD was not superior to PVI.
INTRODUCTION: Adjunctive complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation or ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation have been proposed as new strategies to increase the elimination of AF, but the difference between CFAE/GP ablation and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), as well as the combined effect of CFAE/GP plus PVI ablation were unclear. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether adjunctive cardiac autonomic denervation (CAD) was effective for the elimination of AF, and whether CAD alone was superior to PVI in AFpatients. METHODS: A systemic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCRT) was performed and controlled trials comparing the effect of PVI plus CFAE/GP ablation with PVI, as well as CFAE/GP ablation with PVI were collected. RESULTS: A total of 15 trials including 1,147 patients with AF were qualified for this meta-analysis. CAD plus PVI significantly increased the freedom from AF/ATs (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.33-2.59, P = 0.29). Subgroup analysis showed that additional CAD increased the ratio of sinus rhythm maintenance in both paroxysmal AF (OR 1.69; 95% CI: 1.09-2.62, P = 0.41) and nonparoxysmal AF (OR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.14-3.90, P = 0.14). Besides, when compared respectively, adjunctive CAD was not superior to PVI (OR 0.31; 95% CI: 0.11-0.86, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that CAD plus PVI significantly increase the freedom from recurrence of AF both in paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal patients. However, when compared alone, the benefit of CAD was not superior to PVI.
Authors: S Ashwin Reddy; Sarah L Nethercott; Bharat V Khialani; Andrew A Grace; Claire A Martin Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Polydoros N Kampaktsis; Evangelos K Oikonomou; Daniel Y Choi; Jim W Cheung Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 1.900