Literature DB >> 22429176

Evaluating cognitive ability, knowledge tests and situational judgement tests for postgraduate selection.

Anna Koczwara1, Fiona Patterson, Lara Zibarras, Maire Kerrin, Bill Irish, Martin Wilkinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and utility of and candidate reactions towards cognitive ability tests, and current selection methods, including a clinical problem-solving test (CPST) and a situational judgement test (SJT), for postgraduate selection. METHODS;  This was an exploratory, longitudinal study to evaluate the validities of two cognitive ability tests (measuring general intelligence) compared with current selection tests, including a CPST and an SJT, in predicting performance at a subsequent selection centre (SC). Candidate reactions were evaluated immediately after test administration to examine face validity. Data were collected from candidates applying for entry into training in UK general practice (GP) during the 2009 recruitment process. Participants were junior doctors (n = 260). The mean age of participants was 30.9 years and 53.1% were female. Outcome measures were participants' scores on three job simulation exercises at the SC.
RESULTS: Findings indicate that all tests measure overlapping constructs. Both the CPST and SJT independently predicted more variance than the cognitive ability test measuring non-verbal mental ability. The other cognitive ability test (measuring verbal, numerical and diagrammatic reasoning) had a predictive value similar to that of the CPST and added significant incremental validity in predicting performance on job simulations in an SC. The best single predictor of performance at the SC was the SJT. Candidate reactions were more positive towards the CPST and SJT than the cognitive ability tests.
CONCLUSIONS: In terms of operational validity and candidate acceptance, the combination of the current CPST and SJT proved to be the most effective administration of tests in predicting selection outcomes. In terms of construct validity, the SJT measures procedural knowledge in addition to aspects of declarative knowledge and fluid abilities and is the best single predictor of performance in the SC. Further research should consider the validity of the tests in this study in predicting subsequent performance in training. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429176     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04195.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Situational Judgement Test to Develop Non-Academic Skills in Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Kirsten Galbraith; Charlotte Flaxman; Carl M J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Inferring signs from purposeful samples: The role of context in competency assessment.

Authors:  Marise Ph Born; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Chantal E E van Andel
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 7.647

Review 3.  Evaluating the Whole Applicant: Use of Situational Judgment Testing and Personality Testing to Address Disparities in Resident Selection.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Takacs; Chad R Tracy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.862

4.  Evaluation of two selection tests for recruitment into radiology specialty training.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Alec Knight; Liam McKnight; Thomas C Booth
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school.

Authors:  Susanna M Lucieer; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Remy M J P Rikers; Axel P N Themmen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  Proficiency testing for admission to the postgraduate family medicine education.

Authors:  Birgitte Schoenmakers; Johan Wens
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

7.  To what extent does the Health Professions Admission Test-Ireland predict performance in early undergraduate tests of communication and clinical skills? An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Maureen E Kelly; Daniel Regan; Fidelma Dunne; Patrick Henn; John Newell; Siun O'Flynn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions.

Authors:  Adrian Husbands; Mark J Rodgerson; Jon Dowell; Fiona Patterson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  P300 correlates with learning & memory abilities and fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Hafeez Ullah Amin; Aamir Saeed Malik; Nidal Kamel; Weng-Tink Chooi; Muhammad Hussain
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Integrity situational judgement test for medical school selection: judging 'what to do' versus 'what not to do'.

Authors:  Wendy E de Leng; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Marise Ph Born; Axel P N Themmen
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 6.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.