BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Developing novel anti-platelet strategies is fundamental to reducing the impact of thrombotic diseases. Thrombin activates platelets via proteinase-activated receptors (PARs), and PAR antagonists are being evaluated in clinical trials for prevention of arterial thrombosis. However, one such trial was recently suspended due to increased bleeding in patients receiving a PAR₁ antagonist in addition to anti-platelet drugs that most often included both aspirin and clopidogrel. Therefore, it remains unclear how to best manipulate PARs for safe antithrombotic activity. To address this, we have examined potential interactions between existing anti-platelet drugs and strategies that target PARs. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used in vivo mouse models in which interactions between various anti-platelet strategies could be evaluated. We examined the effects on thrombosis and haemostasis in PAR₄ -/- mice (platelets unresponsive to thrombin) treated with therapeutic doses of either aspirin or clopidogrel. KEY RESULTS: Using a model in which occlusive thrombosis occurred in PAR₄ -/- mice or wild-type mice treated with aspirin or clopidogrel, PAR₄ -/- mice treated with either anti-platelet agent showed marked protection against thrombosis. This antithrombotic effect occurred without any effect on haemostasis with aspirin, but not clopidogrel. Furthermore, specifically targeting thrombin-induced platelet activation (via PARs) improved the therapeutic window of non-specifically inhibiting thrombin functions (via anticoagulants). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results indicate that PAR antagonists used in combination with aspirin provide a potent yet safe antithrombotic strategy in mice and provide insights into the safety and efficacy of using PAR antagonists for the prevention of acute coronary syndromes in humans.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Developing novel anti-platelet strategies is fundamental to reducing the impact of thrombotic diseases. Thrombin activates platelets via proteinase-activated receptors (PARs), and PAR antagonists are being evaluated in clinical trials for prevention of arterial thrombosis. However, one such trial was recently suspended due to increased bleeding in patients receiving a PAR₁ antagonist in addition to anti-platelet drugs that most often included both aspirin and clopidogrel. Therefore, it remains unclear how to best manipulate PARs for safe antithrombotic activity. To address this, we have examined potential interactions between existing anti-platelet drugs and strategies that target PARs. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used in vivo mouse models in which interactions between various anti-platelet strategies could be evaluated. We examined the effects on thrombosis and haemostasis in PAR₄ -/- mice (platelets unresponsive to thrombin) treated with therapeutic doses of either aspirin or clopidogrel. KEY RESULTS: Using a model in which occlusive thrombosis occurred in PAR₄ -/- mice or wild-type mice treated with aspirin or clopidogrel, PAR₄ -/- mice treated with either anti-platelet agent showed marked protection against thrombosis. This antithrombotic effect occurred without any effect on haemostasis with aspirin, but not clopidogrel. Furthermore, specifically targeting thrombin-induced platelet activation (via PARs) improved the therapeutic window of non-specifically inhibiting thrombin functions (via anticoagulants). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results indicate that PAR antagonists used in combination with aspirin provide a potent yet safe antithrombotic strategy in mice and provide insights into the safety and efficacy of using PAR antagonists for the prevention of acute coronary syndromes in humans.
Authors: Pierluigi Tricoci; Zhen Huang; Claes Held; David J Moliterno; Paul W Armstrong; Frans Van de Werf; Harvey D White; Philip E Aylward; Lars Wallentin; Edmond Chen; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Jinglan Pei; Sergio Leonardi; Tyrus L Rorick; Ann M Kilian; Lisa H K Jennings; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Christoph Bode; Angel Cequier; Jan H Cornel; Rafael Diaz; Aycan Erkan; Kurt Huber; Michael P Hudson; Lixin Jiang; J Wouter Jukema; Basil S Lewis; A Michael Lincoff; Gilles Montalescot; José Carlos Nicolau; Hisao Ogawa; Matthias Pfisterer; Juan Carlos Prieto; Witold Ruzyllo; Peter R Sinnaeve; Robert F Storey; Marco Valgimigli; David J Whellan; Petr Widimsky; John Strony; Robert A Harrington; Kenneth W Mahaffey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simone M Schoenwaelder; Kate E Jarman; Elizabeth E Gardiner; My Hua; Jianlin Qiao; Michael J White; Emma C Josefsson; Imala Alwis; Akiko Ono; Abbey Willcox; Robert K Andrews; Kylie D Mason; Hatem H Salem; David C S Huang; Benjamin T Kile; Andrew W Roberts; Shaun P Jackson Journal: Blood Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Louis D Fiore; Michael D Ezekowitz; Mary T Brophy; David Lu; Joseph Sacco; Peter Peduzzi Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-02-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jessica K Mountford; Claire Petitjean; Harun W Kusuma Putra; Jonathan A McCafferty; Natasha M Setiabakti; Hannah Lee; Lotte L Tønnesen; James D McFadyen; Simone M Schoenwaelder; Anita Eckly; Christian Gachet; Sarah Ellis; Anne K Voss; Ross A Dickins; Justin R Hamilton; Shaun P Jackson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jennifer Yeung; Benjamin E Tourdot; Reheman Adili; Abigail R Green; Cody J Freedman; Pilar Fernandez-Perez; Johnny Yu; Theodore R Holman; Michael Holinstat Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Robert H Lee; Tomohiro Kawano; Steven P Grover; Vanthana Bharathi; David Martinez; Dale O Cowley; Nigel Mackman; Wolfgang Bergmeier; Silvio Antoniak Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Shauna L French; Antonia C Paramitha; Mitchell J Moon; Ross A Dickins; Justin R Hamilton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 3.240